(Disclaimer: This transcript is auto-generated and may contain mistakes.) Of course there is a lot of discrepancies there's a lot of contradictions there's a lot of contradictions in this book 500 to be exact. 500 contradictions in the Bible can you show me one? Seriously? Yeah show me one contradiction. We're talking about something else so basically what we're talking about if there's 500 can't you show me one? So when we're talking about so we're talking about the differences between when we're talking about the differences between secularism and there's a name one contradiction within the law there's a lot of them there's a lot of them everywhere we have them in in many Supreme Court cases we are in the land of suing we're in the land of endless appeals of court systems there is something that can always be overturned no matter what so yes there might be some laws you can point out and say I've researched this and I found that this law does this but if it ever were to be enacted in today's society it will get overturned Well you know Reid I think that we just fundamentally disagree and I think that a lot of our facts are misconstrued because America was founded upon the Bible and Christian principles many of the laws of America had direct references to the Bible even in court today you have to put people put a hand on a Bible many times every single president has put his hand on a Bible to swear an oath into office sure but to say that we're a secular society is just kind of to deny reality and deny the history of our country I believe it will become more secularized and there's been a polarization away from the Bible in more recent context but just to suggest that we're a secular society is just kind of to ignore a lot of history and here's the thing secular society so but obviously we've deviated from our original premise and I get it it was my doing okay over women staying home in certain aspects when it comes to the agreement of both parties and I really enjoyed that conversation and we got into the gender wage gap it did become an argument between this and this and this and