(Disclaimer: This transcript is auto-generated and may contain mistakes.)

Whenever an evolutionist says mutations are our proof, it just goes to show they don't even know what a mutation is. The definition of a mutation is copying error. So by all these errors, somehow we've gotten perfect. That's their logic. They'll say, well vestigial organs are proof that we're evolving. So by losing organs, somehow we've gained it all. By losing things and by errors, all of a sudden we have perfection. What on earth? This isn't just unscientific. This stuff is bizarre. You're taking information from one parent, information from another parent, slapping that information together, creating offspring. That's like slapping peanut butter and jelly together and they're saying, oh that's perfectly new information. No, it's taking pre-existing information and putting that information together. It's not creating new information. This is science 101.