There's a great verse in 2 Timothy 2 that says,
study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed,
rightly dividing the word of truth. And it angers me that these bunch of hyper-dispensationalists
have totally twisted that verse and turned it on its head to teach a bunch of nonsense heresy
about there being different gospels for different ages. We need to rightly divide the word of truth
and I think it's time for us to take back what that actually means from the hyper-dispensationalists
out there. How about Old Testament versus New Testament? How about prescriptive passages versus
descriptive passages? How about spiritual salvation versus physical salvation? Or,
you know, historical versus prophetic scriptures? You know, some scriptures are more historical or
they have a historical fulfillment while others are about the future. Many, many times it's about
both literal versus figurative. You know, some things in the Bible are literal, some are more
figurative or symbolic. But my point is that there are many ways that we as Christians should
rightly divide the word of truth to properly interpret the Bible. But here's the thing,
none of them have anything to do with another gospel. That is preposterous. That is not what
the Bible teaches anywhere. There's always ever been one gospel and we need to make sure that we
take back this idea, this concept of rightly dividing the word of truth and emphasize what
that actually means, what that's actually talking about and apply it correctly. Because as I just
showed you, there's many correct ways to apply that and, you know, these hyper-dispensationalists
have no idea what they're talking about. Yes, we should rightly divide the word of truth. There's
no question about that. Doesn't mean that there are other gospels out there. And in fact,
if any man preach any other gospel unto you, the Bible says that person ought to be accursed.