Would you say that most Ruckmanites believe that the King James Bible deviates from the TR?
If so, what misconceptions make them think this? Yes, they do think that, and it's because people
publish these lists of discrepancies between the King James and the TR, and they're totally bogus.
One time I sat down with Gale Riplinger's list of 50-some discrepancies, and I had that list,
Greek New Testament and King James. I looked up all of them, and they were all bogus except two
out of 54 or whatever. I found two that were legit. One of them was the amen missing at the
end of the book of Ephesians. So I just pulled out my Greek New Testament, just wrote the word
amin, and it was fixed. And then one of them says, you know, it's word of God instead of
word of the Lord. So both of them are just completely meaningless. They don't change any
meaning. Is there some difference between the word of God or the word of the Lord? Well, I'm sure
according to a Ruckmanite there's a difference, because they think the kingdom of God and the
kingdom of heaven are totally different, you know. So word of God, word of the Lord, ad and amen,
it's two typos, no big deal. Everything else was a fraud. But they don't expect you to actually
look them up. They just expect you to just take their word for it. If you do some fact-checking
on Gail Ripplinger, you're gonna find a lot of inaccuracy in her work, period. She's a bold-faced
liar in her work, a lot. She'll misquote people and twist things, and yeah. Was it you that showed
the ellipses, or were you going through James White's book where it was talking about Gail
Gail Ripplinger quoting somebody and there was like five ellipses?
Gail Ripplinger will quote someone and put like two words, dot dot dot, three words, dot dot dot,
two words, and make them say something that they didn't even say. Right. It's absurd.