Hillary Clinton recently said that babies are people, but they don't have constitutional rights.
When or if does an unborn child have constitutional rights?
Well, under our laws currently, that is not something that exists.
The unborn person doesn't have constitutional rights.
Most people, not all Republicans, not all conservatives, even agree with the life of the mother, but most do.
Where the distinction comes in is the health of the mother.
And when you have candidates running for president who say that there should be no exceptions,
not for rape, not for incest, not for health, then I think you've gotten pretty extreme.
Well, the truth is that the protection of the life of the mother as an excuse for an abortion is a smokescreen.
This is former Surgeon General C. Everett Koop.
He says in his 36 years in pediatric surgery, he has never known of one instance where the child had to be aborted to save the mother's life.
If toward the end of the pregnancy, complications arise that threaten the mother's health,
he will take the child by inducing labor or performing a c-section.
His intention is still to save the life of both the mother and the baby.
The baby will be premature and perhaps immature depending on the length of gestation.
Because it has suddenly been taken out of the protective womb, it may encounter threats to its survival.
The baby is never willfully destroyed because the mother's life is in danger.
This is a lie that these evil people use to justify murdering an unborn child.
And they talk about rape and incest. Why would you murder a child for the sins of the mother or the sins of the father?
That makes absolutely no sense.
I mean, you have to be absolutely pure evil to believe something like this.
Be sure to like the video, leave your comments below, and if you're new, be sure to subscribe to my channel.
Thanks for watching.