Hey everybody, Pastor Steven Anderson here from Faith Ward Baptist Church in Tempe, Arizona
to show you what a fraud this pseudo-intellectual fake Muslim scholar is. He puts the Greek
text from the New Testament up on the screen pretending that he knows Greek or that he
knows anything about Greek. I'm going to prove to you that he knows absolutely nothing about
Greek. He's a total fake and he's lying about what the text says. But anyway, he puts this
up on the screen. He points to the word to and he says this is the Greek word for son
here. See, it's very clear. It's right there. It's clearly son here. Here the word for son
is to. There is a kunaiq word for daughter. It should have been Mary, the tigat, the daughter
of Eli. But here it mentions to, which is the son that this is in Ash, the two of Seth,
the two of Adam, the two of God. This is the word for son, not the word for daughter.
It is not a reference to son-in-law. When in reality the word to means the. Okay, now
stop and think about it, folks. When you're learning a foreign language, the word the
is a pretty basic word that you learn pretty quick. So this shows that the guy knows literally
zero about Greek and he just makes a fool of himself by putting this on the screen and
saying see, it's right there, the word for son. And he's like the two of Eli, the two
of Matthan. He's basically saying the the, the the of Matthan, the the of Eli because
he knows absolutely nothing about what he's talking about. So, you know, he can have as
many books on the shelf behind him as he wants, but that's not scholarship. Okay. And the
points that I made in my previous video about the genealogy in Matthew chapter one and Luke
chapter three stand and this guy is a fraud and this is why people shouldn't go back to
the Greek and talk about the Greek when they haven't even learned the language, then don't
talk about it. Hey, it's okay if you don't know Greek, but quit talking about things
that you don't understand. Okay. The next thing is that he confuses me saying that the
Bible was written by 40 authors over the course of 1600 years. He thinks I'm talking about
the New Testament. He thinks I'm saying that the New Testament is written over 1600 years
or by 40 authors. Any Christian that's watching this, please see what your pastor Christian
pastor is saying that the Bible is not the work of just the disciples. It is not the
work of Jesus. It's not work of the people that were around Jesus, but rather 39 authors
over when were this written in the time of Jesus? No, no, he says over 1600 years in
three different languages. Absolutely not. There are only 27 books in the New Testament
and you know, 13 or 14 of them are written by one person, the apostle Paul. Obviously
when I said that there are approximately 40 authors and that it's written over 16 years,
I'm talking about the Bible. That's why I said the Bible is written in three languages
because the Old Testament is written in Hebrew with about 269 verses in Aramaic and the New
Testament is written 100% in Greek. 100% of the New Testament was written in the first
century AD. So no, the New Testament was only written over the course of a couple of decades.
Course of a couple of decades, the New Testament was written. In his previous video, he acknowledged
that the New Testament was written in the first century AD, that it was written between
like around AD 50 and AD 100. Okay. But then he claims that, Oh, it was written by people
who based it on the writings of people who based it on the writings of the people based
on the writings. It wasn't any of the people that were actually there. This book is based
on some of the writings that are based on some of the writings of some of the writings
of some of the writings that might have been the followers of Jesus. Well, newsflash, if
Jesus Christ died on the cross around 32 AD, then guess what? In 50 AD there are going
to be a lot of eyewitnesses still alive. They're even going to be a lot of eyewitnesses alive
even approaching 100 AD. Okay. And so the New Testament was written, you know, starting
around, you know, the 50s AD, it was probably written mostly, you know, closer to the 50
AD side of that, but you know, between 50 and 100 AD is even what he's acknowledging.
Okay. So when I say the Bible is written over the course of 1600 years, that's because I'm
talking about the fact that Moses wrote the Pentateuch around 1500 BC. Okay. So from 1500
BC to 100 AD, that's your 1600 years that just completely went over his head. Also,
he brags again in this video about how Muhammad was illiterate. That is correct. The only
mistake he makes is he says the author is Muhammad peace be upon him. But that is impossible.
I'll tell you why he couldn't read or write. He couldn't read or write. Well, let me just
explain some to you. Unless you have some kind of a mental disability, being illiterate
makes you stupid and lazy. It's laziness and stupidity. Okay. If we study the Old Testament
and the New Testament, being literate is not optional. You know, God commands us to study
to show ourselves approved unto God, search the scriptures. Jesus constantly asked the
question, how readest thou? Have you not read? You are not knowing the scriptures,
scripture meaning that which was written. And so not being able to read and write makes
you lazy, stupid or both. Okay. Also, he's completely confused on the lengths of generations.
He thinks that people being in different generations means that they lived at different times.
That's total nonsense. Okay. For example, you know, I have a child that's one year old
and I have a child that's 19 years old. Okay. Well, if my 19 year old has children, they're
going to be one generation removed from the children that I'm still having with my wife.
Okay. So I could have a kid when I'm 20, I could have a kid when I'm 50 or, and obviously
women past childbearing age, but there are men who are way older who have born children
very late in life. For example, motorcycle legend, Malcolm Smith, his dad was 82 years
old when he was born. But realistically, all the time you've got 40, 50, 60 year olds having
kids, 20 year olds having kids. So you can't just put an arbitrary length on a generation.
He puts a length 50 years, which is totally ridiculous because who actually thinks that
an average generation is 50 years that you have 15 extra generations. Well, what was
the age difference here? If we're seeing 15 more generations, you know, on average between
50 to 70 to a hundred years per per generation, but let's take a very moderate number 50 years.
So 50 years times 15, that's 750 years that are missing in Matthew's genealogy point is
you could have a 20 year long generation. You could have a 50 year long generation. And like
I said, when we're dealing with patrilineal lines, you could have a 70 year generation. Okay. So
sorry, but the number of generations does not determine an exact length of time. And you could
have two people living at the same time. And one of them is 15 generations away versus 20 generations
away. That's totally meaningless. Okay. So he doesn't seem to understand how that works. You
know, my cousin was actually older than one of his uncles. Okay. Because that's how real life
works with generations. But not only that, the genealogy in Matthew for sure does not include
every name. It's only including important names. And so that's the reason why there's a dramatic
difference between those two. But even if you included every name, you could have those other
differences. He doesn't get that at all. And then he claims that I skipped some of the
contradictions that he brought up. That's not true. I was responding to one video. And I
responded to every single contradiction that he brought up in that video. And then he he tries to
debunk me saying that there are different ways of counting how many troops are in an army. Because I
brought up the fact that you know, are you counting reserves? What ages are you counting? Are
you counting active duty? You know, are you counting just this branch or just the the guys
that are actually doing the fighting? Or are you counting actual, you know, support troops? And he
claims that this is impossible because it's the same guy doing the counting in both cases, Joab
counted in both scriptures.
So there are more than one way to count?
Yeah, there's more than one way to count. Look up how many troops are in the US military. And
you're going to get all different numbers, depending on who's being counted, you know,
what's included.
The same person is counting, Joe. It's not a different person counting. Two plus two is four.
That's the only way to count it.
I guess the Muslims have come a long way since they invented algebra. This is the level of math
that they're comfortable with right now. Yeah, but does he really think that Joab just goes out
and does this major census of the military, and then just comes back with like a three by five
card with like two numbers on it? Like he just comes back and just reports two totals? That's
ridiculous. Obviously, when Joab reported to David, he gave him a breakdown that was way more
complicated than what's in Scripture, like, okay, we got this many chariots, we got this many on
horses, we got this many from this tribe, we got this many from this tribe, we got this many from
this tribe, we know that that's how he counted. And that it was that, you know, you don't just
show up and just give one number, when you do a census, every census is going to contain a
breakdown. So then, when the author of Chronicles, versus the author of Second Samuel, goes to give
a total, they counted differently, based on the raw data. But then he claims that I'm just making
things up with no evidence. And he gives me this challenge.
Now, what's interesting is this pastor presents no textual evidence for anything. No, no, nothing
from the Bible itself. He just makes it up. I challenge him to bring us a text in the Bible,
chapter and verse that says, Michal, she was married to a different man, had five children,
and then got married to David, and had no children. And she still had the five children from
her first marriage, no such verse, he's making it up challenge accepted. Okay, here's the chapter
and verse First Samuel 25, verse 44. But Saul had given Michal his daughter, David's wife, to
Faltai, the son of Laish, which was of Gallim. So right there is the chapter and verse First Samuel
2544, where David's wife was given to another man in marriage. Second Samuel, chapter three, verse
13. This is where David wants to get her back after she's been with this other man for many,
many years. Second Samuel 313. And he said, Well, I will make a league with thee but one thing I
require of thee that is thou shalt not see my face except thou first bring Michal, Saul's daughter
when thou comest to see my face. And David sent messengers to Ish-bosheth, Saul's son, saying,
deliver me, my wife Michal, which I spoused to me for 100 foreskins of the Philistines.
And Ish-bosheth sent and took her from her husband, even from Faltiel, the son of Laish,
and her husband went with her along weeping behind her to behore him, then said Abner unto him,
go return and he returned. And the king, here's another scripture, because I want to fulfill all
of his requirements here, right? He said, show me chapter and verse where she was married to
a different man. Did we see that? Show me in chapter verse where she, you know, again went
back to David. Well, we've got a verse on that. Show me chapter and verse where she had five
children, and that she still had those five children from the other marriage. Okay. Second
Samuel 21 eight, but the king took the two sons of Rizpah, the daughter of Aah, whom she bear unto
Saul, are Monai and Mephibosheth, and the five sons of Michal, the daughter of Saul, whom she
brought up for Adriel, the son of Barzillai, the Meholothite. Okay. So right there, we have in
Second Samuel 21 eight, which is after the verse that he's asking, showing that she still had those
five children all the way in Second Samuel 21 eight, she had those five children from another
man. Okay. And he brings up that there's an alternate theory that basically she's actually
adopted these children from another, you know, from her sister, Merab, who was actually the
one who was with Adriel, the son of Barzillai, the Meholothite. Okay. That's another theory.
He brings up the fact that two Christian pastors have two different interpretations or two
different theories. How can they both be right? Well, obviously they can't both be right.
Obviously that other Christian pastor who says that Luke chapter three is not Mary's genealogy
is wrong. I can't be responsible for every Christian pastor who's wrong about something.
Okay. But the bottom line is the Bible is the word of God. The Bible does not have any meaningful
real contradictions. It might have apparent contradictions until you study and learn and
understand what's being said and get it in context. But no, the Bible doesn't have any
contradictions. And this Sheikh Uthman is a fraud who pretends to be a scholar. He pretends like he
knows what he's talking about. He puts Greek on the screen to try to snow you. And he proves that
he doesn't even know the word the, because he literally puts the definite article on the screen
too, which anyone who literally studied Greek for like an hour or two hours would know that that is
one of the first words that you learn for the, as a beginning Greek student,
he puts that on the screen and thinks it's the word for son. And he's like, the two of Helah.
Nope. Wrong. You don't know anything about Greek. You don't have the truth, my friend,
because you are worshiping a false God. And Mohammed is a false prophet. He's a pedophile
who had sex with a nine-year-old because he's a pervert. And any of you Muslims at home watching
this, if you defend him having sex with a nine-year-old, then you're a pervert too.
Okay. So it's just that simple. And so don't be deceived by this lying false teacher,
pseudo intellectual who pretends to know Greek. He pretends to know the Bible.
He pretends to know these things. He actually doesn't know anything about it as I've proven.
God bless you. Have a great day.