Hey everybody, Pastor Steven Anderson here from Faithful Word Baptist Church in Tempe, Arizona
to comment on the Mars landing today.
I thought it was funny that the moment that they had confirmed the touchdown of this latest Mars rover,
that the first words out of their mouth at mission control were that something to the effect of
now that it was ready to begin searching the sands for signs of past life.
Touchdown confirmed. Perseverance safely on the surface of Mars ready to begin seeking the sands of past life.
It cracks me up after so many missions to Mars. I mean there have been like 49 attempted missions
to Mars. There's been I believe eight successful missions. There's like five rovers on Mars and now
today you know landing on Mars once again with a machine and they're still looking for life on Mars.
It's obvious that there's no life on Mars, okay? It's as dead as a doornail but they're just
obsessed with finding life on Mars or finding signs of past life because they just really want
to believe that life just comes into existence on its own when in reality life can only be created
by a divine act, by a direct act of God. In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth.
God created the animals. God created human beings. He breathed into man's nostrils the breath of life
and he became a living soul. But even plants and animals you know were created by a divine
act from God and non-life never begets life. That's one of the first things that you learn in
biology is that only life can beget life. So where did the first life forms come from? Well we
believe that they were created by God as Christians but it's amazing how many scientists will claim
that life came about from non-life even though they have no theory of how that happened. There's
no way that they can even begin to explain that process but they just really want life to have
come into existence on its own so that they can just exclude God and and discard religion and so
forth. And so they just really want to find signs of past life on Mars. They're not going to find it.
They've already been looking. They've already been searching. It isn't there, okay? Here's a little
blast from the past. Back in 1996 there was a supposed discovery of evidence for life on Mars.
You know NASA had made the announcement that they believed that they had evidence
of life on Mars and it was it was a big deal at the time. I vaguely remember it and Bill Clinton
did a little press conference about it on the White House lawn on TV back in 1996 when this
happened and of course you know it didn't pan out. It turned out that they were mistaken and
now you know 25 years later everyone agrees that that finding from 1996 was bogus but it's like
they're just hell-bent on this. They just want it to be there so badly but here's what I thought was
ironic is that right after Bill Clinton talks about this possible discovery of life on Mars
it just rolls directly into a question about abortion and he just establishes his pro-choice
position. Today ROC 84001 speaks to us across all those billions of years and millions of miles.
It speaks of the possibility of life. If this discovery is confirmed it will surely be one
of the most stunning insights into our universe that science has ever uncovered. Its implications
are as far-reaching and awe-inspiring as can be imagined. Even as it promises answers to
some of our oldest questions it poses still others even more fundamental. We will continue
to listen closely to what it has to say as we continue the search for answers and for knowledge
that is as old as humanity itself but essential to our people's future. Thank you.
Republicans right now are going through a wrenching abortion debate. At the same time
pro-choice advocates have created the pro-choice public education project they're calling it. They
say abortion rights are under a very grave danger. Would you agree with that assessment and what do
you think of the republicans troubles? Right now we have a supreme court decision and an
administration committed to the pro-choice position. And isn't it ironic that the pro-choice
liberals they claim to be so into science and so scientific but yet they reject the scientific
definition of life. I've watched political debates where the moderator asked democratic candidates
when does life begin and they said at birth. You know life does not begin at conception it begins
at birth and that's why they would even be okay with partial birth abortion third trimester
abortion. But let me tell you something from conception on biology would tell you
that the baby is alive and obviously it's human it's a living human organism even by the
definitions of biology. So isn't it funny how liberals kind of pick and choose when they want
to believe in science and when they don't because they don't accept the scientific definition for
life. And here's the thing this super ultra tiny bacteria that they thought that they had discovered
in 1996 was so exciting life on mars but yet the blastocyst growing in a mother's womb that little
tiny baby that fetus is way more impressive than this supposed bacteria that they thought they had
discovered. But yet they would have disdain and disregard for that human child growing in its
mother's womb and get all excited about some ultra tiny bacteria on mars that turns out to not even
exist in the first place. And it's funny how you know bill clinton says we gotta keep looking for
answers you know we gotta keep on uh seeing what's out we gotta listen let this this meteorite speak
to us and and this you know bacteria can speak to us but i already have the answers because the
answers are found in the bible the answers are found in god's word i already know where we came
from and i already know where we're going and and those are questions that science can never answer
science can never and will never answer those questions because those are spiritual questions
those are religious questions they're not scientific questions and so when science tries
to philosophize and when science tries to replace god it's absurd and it has nothing to do with
actually looking at the evidence because you can just show them so much evidence
on the origin of life and they will just go with their atheistic ideology in many cases anyway i
just wanted to make those comments because this was something that just happened today and how
they're excited that they landed on mars once again and i'm sure there are a lot of really
interesting scientific discoveries that are going to come from this mars landing so i'm not
i'm not saying that the mars landing is totally in vain but i am saying that the search for past
life on mars is in vain because life can only be created directly by god
and you're not going to find any past life on mars