Hey guys, this is Matt Powell. So evolutionists love to use dinosaurs to try to disprove the Bible
and disprove young earth creationism, and they will use God's own creation against Him. But one
of the things that I think is important to share with people and with your children and with your
loved ones that believe in evolution is the fact that we actually find soft tissue from dinosaur
bones. We find collagen, we find blood cells with hemoglobin still in the blood, we also find
DNA, dinosaur DNA, and so these are all things that should have deteriorated if they died out
65 plus million years ago. And so we're finding soft tissue and DNA inside of duck-billed dinosaurs,
we're finding it inside of t-rexes with Mary Schweitzer's discovery in 2005 and in 1990.
These discoveries literally prove beyond any shadow of doubt that these creatures died recently
and not millions of years ago because organic material can only last a maximum of about 10,000
years before it will deteriorate. Now evolutionists will go running to preservation. They think that
preservation techniques are the reason that the dinosaur DNA or blood with hemoglobin in the cells
didn't deteriorate for millions and millions of years. And they think that somehow there was
preservation that took place, but if I was to take dinosaur soft tissue or DNA and put that DNA
instead of an airtight jar and take that airtight jar and put that in another airtight jar and then
take that airtight jar and put that in another airtight jar and in another airtight jar and
another airtight jar, look deep time will always cause things to deteriorate. You can't run to
preservation and say that somehow it was magically preserved over the course of millions of years.
That's just completely irrational and illogical in every sense of the word. And number two,
when Mary Schweitzer had to deal with this, because remember when she made the discoveries
in 1990 and in 2005, evolutionists were criticizing her and saying that she needed
to come up with a mechanism for how these things lasted for 65 plus million years. So Dr. Schweitzer's
conclusion was that if you put dinosaur blood or blood of any creature and encapsulate it in iron,
that the iron will preserve the blood cells and that's how it lasted in deep time. This is their
claim. But the truth is, when we look in nature, we don't see things magically getting encapsulated
by iron when they die. Nature doesn't do that. I mean, if you slay an animal and you put it out in
nature, you even cover it with sediment, nature doesn't automatically just encapsulate dead
organisms inside of iron. It does the exact opposite. It scatters the DNA molecules. Since when
does anything in nature die and get encapsulated by iron by nature? It just doesn't happen.
So their claim that, well, iron could preserve it. Okay, maybe to claim that nature somehow does this
is completely pathetic because we don't ever see that in nature. We don't see
organisms getting encapsulated by iron. It just doesn't happen. So their rescue device, that iron
could be what's preserving the blood cells, just falls apart at the fundamental of what we observe
nature do to organisms that die. Nature doesn't magically encapsulate organisms in iron and
magically preserve things. Everything that dies in nature deteriorates over time. And so this
is just great proof that dinosaur DNA, dinosaur blood that we're finding in all sorts of different
dinosaurs, whether it be a t-rex or duck bills, baby duck bills, these things all prove that
dinosaurs died recently. Even a child can learn to defend the Bible using God's creation, using
his beasts, the dinosaurs, and can learn to defeat evolution. This is information that we need to
always remember. And their weak rescue device of, well, the blood could be preserved by iron.
Since when do we see that in nature? Never. Because it doesn't happen and it doesn't make sense
because it's not true. God bless, guys.
you