Alright guys, well today is going to be another Answers in Creation episode.
We are on episode 7 and of course we have Matt Powell in the house and we also have
Shane in the studio.
So this is exciting, joining us for his first ever episode of Answers in Creation and we
also have creation scientist Dr. Raw Matt.
And so thank you so much Matt for coming on the program and I got to be more specific,
I can't just say Matt or I'm going to have two people answer me during this episode but
I appreciate everyone tuning in to tonight's program.
Make sure you share this on your social media account, it's going to be a great episode.
Matt why don't you, Matt Powell, why don't you start us off man and just explain what
we're going to be talking about tonight.
Sure thing.
Well tonight's going to be a plethora of things.
We're going to basically be talking about flood evidence and just real basic things
once again.
Like I've always said, we want to put the cookies on the bottom shelf for everybody
on this show and Dr. Raw Matt does a really fine job at doing that.
And so I'm really excited about having him on for this interview tonight and I'm excited
that Shane's with us and it's going to be a great episode.
But I actually sent you a link to a video that actually features Dr. Raw Matt.
He's going to be one of the main scientists in the new documentary coming out this month.
At the end of this month, The Atheist Religion.
And so I just sent you a movie preview and so if we could play that it kind of introduces
Dr. Raw Matt a little bit because he's a part of that and it gives us a little background
on him and we'll get the episode rolling.
Awesome, alright well I am pulling it up right now.
Again guys, thank you so much for tuning in to tonight's program.
Make sure you share this, it's going to be a great episode.
Here we go.
Dinosaur soft tissue is another example of the scientists ignoring the evidence.
Here we have evidence that they're not as old as they say and yet we're supposed to
ignore it because obviously if there's soft tissue it must last 65 million years because
we know dinosaurs were 65 million years ago.
Well are you sure about that because the evidence is saying something else and the truth is
they only accept evidence that lines up with what they've already decided is true and they
ignore the rest but we're all supposed to just accept that as science because they told
us, even though they haven't shown us.
The reason that we lost our hair as apes, because we are apes according to them, the
reason we lost our hair is because apes started sewing and making clothes so they didn't need
their hair anymore.
Think about it people, logic, come on, why did it start needing to wear a jacket?
An ape today doesn't need a jacket no matter where it lives, it can live in the tropics,
you can put it in a zoo in the city, you can put it in the arctic, they live out in the
frost in Japan up in the high mountains and they just sit there, they don't need clothes,
they didn't invent a jacket and be like, you know what, this looks really cool I think
I'm just going to stay on and their dad monkey is like, no don't do that, you're going to
unevolve all your hair and then we're all going to have to wear clothes one day, that's
just ridiculous to think that they started wearing clothes when they don't need them
and that's why we lost our body fur, that's what they believe.
You realize the first part of the scientific method is to make an observation, has anybody
ever observed grandma ape knit some clothing together and put it on her little cubs there?
And so Dr. Raul, Matt, thank you so much for coming on to the show tonight, can you give
us just a small introduction about yourself and what you do in the creation science realm?
Yeah, I am part of a team called Standing for Truth, it's a YouTube channel and a team
of us young earth creationists who defend the faith, we have outright attacked atheism
and challenged anybody that believes in uniformitarianism, that's the belief of naturalism, that's where
nature does everything, you can trust that when nothing exploded and lightning decided
to slam into some mud that all life was created and that it evolved from bacteria and upon
scum into all life on earth, right?
So we challenge that, we make you question evolution and then by asking questions we
like to make people really question what they really believe to be true because the critic
is so fast to say, you guys believe in magic when we know that God disdains magic but that's
how little they actually know, right?
They say that we believe in magic but in reality they believe in impossibilities, meaning they
believe in scenarios that are beyond probable so therefore they're pointing their finger
but the other fingers are pointing right back at them, they haven't critically looked at
what they really believe to be true because they're too busy mocking and ridiculing what
they don't already agree with and we come out now, this team Standing for Truth and
we say, wait a minute, there's an alternative to the belief that you've been indoctrinated
with.
We all went to school and we became indoctrinated to believe one thing, evolution and now we
know that this is not true so that's what we teamed up and we fight against online.
Incredible and folks if you have not subscribed to Standing for Truth, the YouTube channel,
I just recommend typing it in and you can see a lot of their debates and they have very
successful debates, Dr. Raumatt has had very very successful debates and in one instance
where a guy tapped out, which I thought was hilarious personally, and a few instances
where the Standing for Truth creationist as well, the man who runs the channel, who's
the main guy on the channel, he's anonymous for the sake of his job but he has done a
fabulous job as well at destroying this false science and so Dr. Raumatt, in the video we
played it mentioned soft tissue and we know that in 1990 Dr. Mary Schweitzer discovered
this soft tissue and as well as in 2005 and so with these discoveries what is a good scientific
analysis to conclude about these discoveries?
So that's the thing is when Mary Schweitzer herself found this evidence she outright denied
it herself and then the first thing she says it was that one I was excited like on the
day of Christmas and two I was afraid.
Why did she say she was afraid?
Because one thing, remember she's a secular scientist and she knew that her discovery
was so controversial that she would probably lose her job.
So what did the evidence really say?
That what she found shouldn't exist because what happens is material, biological material
doesn't exist for millions of years.
It can't.
It doesn't have the shelf life.
It's like putting pickles on the jar and pulling them out and leaving them on the counter.
You're not expecting them to be there next year.
They just they won't be there but yet that's exactly what we found.
We found pickles on the counter that look like you just took them out of the jar that
yesterday doesn't make any sense.
So that's what she discovered.
And so what happened is that one of the things she discovered was blood tissue.
Now blood cells can't last that long so she had to save her job and she said well it seems
like when you suspend blood in iron it now can be preserved.
So she saved her job.
She was able to say it's okay.
Blood can last millions of years as long as it's saturated in iron.
But it negates all the other problems.
You notice they don't like to tell you about the other problems.
They just focus on that one because it's the only one that they've resolved.
So I like to point out the other problems.
Right on.
Excellent answer and then just curious because I know that you did a lot of cage fighting
and like MMA fighting and you're a fighter.
And I think that I personally think that's awesome.
You know if you look in the Bible there is men of God that would be able to fight.
You think of King David, you think of the kings of Israel, even the Philistines.
There were people in the Bible who could really fight.
And you had shared with me a few days ago a scientific quote unquote reason why we grow
a beard.
Would you mind sharing from an evolutionary standpoint why we have a beard and then debunk
it with the facts?
Yeah, yeah I absolutely love to fight.
It was my complete addiction and passion through my entire 20s and probably 30s.
But I was reading through studies because it's fascinating to see what the new studies
that come out.
So this one came out this year and the study was trying to determine why in the world human
beings have such long facial hair.
It doesn't make sense that we can grow a beard that goes down basically as long as we want
it to.
And females really just don't.
So what's going on with males?
So they hypothesized that well the reason must be is because the beard really doesn't
have much of an insulator for heat.
It really doesn't play much of a factor for that.
So the beard probably evolved from being punched in the face.
This was their best explanation for why we have beards and why primates don't.
So I'm guessing somewhere along the lineage of the split from an ancient ancestor what
happened is our missing link primate grandpa Bigfoot started boxing each other and during
their boxing match they passed on their boxing to their kids and then their boxing passed
on and eventually their face was like I can't tolerate being hit I'm going to start growing
facial hair.
That's that's essentially what they're saying.
And the reason that they gave for this is well they wrapped a bone in sheep wool and
dropped it.
And they said look the bone didn't break like when you normally drop it.
So therefore fur must protect your bones from breaking.
As a fighter that is the least of your problems.
Let me tell you when you're being punched in the face have you ever watched a boxer
walk into the ring.
What's the first thing that the coach does.
They smear Vaseline right over your eyebrows.
Do you know why.
Because that's hair.
And when you get punched in the face and it hits the hair your hair is very sharp and
it will cut into your skin and you'll bleed into your eye and the fight has to be stopped.
So you literally don't one get to box do anything you have that fight stopped.
Most of the time it's it's a loss on your record now and you don't get paid.
So it's the worst thing that could possibly happen.
And I've actually grown facial hair out in a fight.
And guess what.
I got caught on my chin.
It's the only scar that I have on my chin is from hair.
It didn't protect me at all.
It did the exact opposite thing.
It actually was worse.
So whoever invented the theory didn't have any logic or any ability to think like let's
see what would happen if I got punched in the face with a beard.
Matter of fact long hair you can pull if you were wearing a beard and I pulled guard meaning
I want you to come down to the ground with me I grabbed your beard I could pull it all
over the place.
It's the exact opposite thing you would want.
So I'm guessing their rescue device would say well that's probably why men started going
bald is because they kept getting their hair pulled.
That's what I mean.
Could it be like maybe maybe they got it backwards maybe it's where they got hit in the faces
where the hair stopped growing.
Right.
So if you keep getting punched in the face all the time right then you will grow no hair
on your face.
And so that's how we evolved from the monkeys or whatever whatever they're saying right.
Well then we would have no eyebrows.
We would have evolved our eyebrows completely away because it's the worst place in the world
to put hair on the on the face would be right above the eyes because you get cut above the
eyes it's going to bleed right into them now you can't see when you're fighting.
So we would have evolved our eyebrows away first.
Well nobody said they were smart so I'm just saying you know like you know I'm just making
an observation that maybe maybe they went bald because they got punched in the head
and they just took all the hair off it's like shaving right.
So who knows right.
Right but you notice today that doesn't happen to primates so I'm guessing what we need to
do as an experiment is take a bunch of chimps and just start blasting them in the face until
we they start growing beards and then boom proof.
Yeah because it should be demonstrated where they turn human eatable or they turn into
humans nonsense I tell you nonsense I'm beside Peter wouldn't allow that had to happen anyway
you know they'd be up in arms you're punching monkeys in the face and zoos you know it wouldn't
go over well wow it's just on it's just unbelievable a lot of this stuff with with you know them
trying to use natural selection as a rescue device for something like this or just saying
that this is how our hair grew out on our faces it's it's so laughable that it's it's
it's kind of funny some of the stuff that they believe I mean you know you've got surfing
monkeys squids coming from outer space men growing hair on their face as a result of
punching to the face I mean this stuff is just weird it's not even just unscientific
it just seems weird doctor on that very peculiar that's why they have to have an explanation
for everything that exists right so if something like like literally somebody asked him like
how come we don't have hair on all over our bodies like what kind of sense does that make
that our primate ancestors did and now we have to wear fur to stay warm why didn't we
just keep our fur so somebody literally had to go to the drawing board and say that's
a good question let's figure that out well maybe they started wearing jackets what I
mean like did they just ask their kid walking by one day like what do you think monkeys
started doing I think they wore jackets okay makes sense to me boom I mean that's the that's
the only thing that comes to my mind because I could come up with a better theory giving
me 10 minutes I mean that's just their rescue devices have gotten to the point where they're
laughable and that's what we're doing now we're literally laughing at their explanations
because they're that ridiculous you know like every month there's a new root common ancestor
if you ever follow the research it's like what did we descend from about six months ago it was
a sponge you know why because that was found in the lowest layers of rock well later they came
along and oh it was a stromatolite because that was in the lowest layer well last month guess
what it was a worm now we're descended from worms worms are the oldest ancestor well guess what
worms burrow that's why they're deeper you know so they're constantly changing it up and they say
well we have to go with the evidence no you should go by logic logic should come first if you're
seeing this constant pattern of how your theory keeps being falsified you don't just come up with
another rescue device you look you should look at stand back and look at your theory again and
question the theory it's so funny these people that question they'll they'll point out they'll
say presuppositional apologetics and I'm personally I'm not really a presuppositionalist but they will
nail presuppositional apologists for believing or having presuppositions but when it comes to
evolution theory it seems like everything is just built on a presupposition to begin with otherwise
why would they use all these rescue devices does yeah does does like you said that that that was a
study so does anybody actually really believe this like or are these just theories that they
throw out and hope you know somebody actually you know takes that as law like you know because like
you said it's kind of hard for it just just logic if you just put a logical mind to it it just makes
no sense but yeah are you saying that people actually believe what you're telling us yeah
this isn't this is you can find it by just googling it and it comes up as a Internet post you know
from like Wired magazine which is a scientific journal then you go through it and they link the
actual scientific peer-reviewed study showing it because remember there's there's kudos in it for
when a scientist comes up with a new discovery or a new theory and since there isn't one really on
facial hair they're trying to get popular and get grant money and get funding so that they can say
hey look where it's valid it's the only theory that's there and it's the one that makes the
most sense and so yeah they want it to take off so that it becomes very popular and they can add
it to public textbooks and then boom you're rich well I just googled it and it's up on life science
did men's beards evolved to absorb a punch to the jaw this is ridiculous so so I got a question so
if they actually get that funding and stuff like that do they have to prove any of this like by
some kind of scientific experiment or they just come up with this theory they get the funding and
then they just like use the money to try to make us believe it that's the question right there that's
a good question and here's the answer that the peer-reviewed study literally did that they took
sheep wool and wrapped it around a bone and dropped weight on it and the bone didn't take
as much damage as when it didn't have wool wrapped around it so that was their their evidence to say
that was the science behind it all that's amazing no definitely wasn't some primate that they
recognized was fighting other primates and all of a sudden it had like half a centimeter more facial
hair and they're like oh maybe that's what's really happening oh no that's the hypothetical
that's what gets injected into their evolutionary belief system and and it must be true until you
can prove them wrong it's like wait you haven't even proven it's true what's going on you know
they'll believe in Bigfoot and aliens and hollow earth that we live in a hologram but creation no
way that's crazy I'll believe that monkeys got hit in the face until they grew beards before that
that's ridiculous yeah top-notch dr. all Matt let me ask you this when it comes to and I just want
to say to the viewers I and I had I had heard you say this dr. all Matt and I thought it was awesome
it is shocking that in 2020 with all the information that we have and the ability to
the ability to google things that people even believe in evolution it is literally shocking
that people even just consider it and it just it just is mind-blowing how about the global flood
because obviously you and you and I would agree that the global flood is is scientific 100% I
would go as far as to say that it's a fact but what are your thoughts on the global flood good
well one of the first things I would like to say to answer your first part was that I think the
biggest problem is that we never deal with evolution besides when we're out of edgy of
public education so we get indoctrinated to learn evolution while we're in school and then we leave
school and it never comes up again you never sit down at a coffee table with somebody and be like
so what do you think about the monkey theory today you know it never comes up so people were
indoctrinated and then they just believe it and then they go about their life and they never
question it you know they don't go on Google and that really question anything and plus let's say
that you were taking a test and you were to write an answer not in your textbook well that's an F
you're gonna fail so it's geared only towards evolution with no other theory allowable so when
it comes to the flood there is catastrophism is removed anything that's a worldwide calamity has
been removed because Lyle Charles Lyle who invented the geologic column he hated God and
he hated anything to do with God and and God was everywhere back when he was alive it was in all
the science textbooks everybody believed in young earth creation and he was despised it so what he
did is he said I need to make the earth look old and I'm going to do that and guess what he wasn't
a geologist he was a lawyer he literally lived in the city writing you know paying people's
taxes so he knew nothing about it he went out there and he said I'm going to trick this and
I'm going to invent this theory and I'm just gonna say that those layers are millions or billions of
years old so that's what he did he went out there without any evidence and he just said these layers
are layers of time so he named them by layers of time so now you can't even say the layers without
people thinking of epochs of time so he did his job it fooled everybody and we literally think
that when we're looking at the layers we're looking at layers of time and that we see more
primitive life the lower levels we get but what we're actually looking at is evidence of the flood
in the most basic form you could ever see like I was saying what are in the lowest layers well we
have worms well worms when they're flooded over they try to survive by actually burrowing they
actually do the opposite of what they probably should do but they know that they're safer
underground so you're gonna find them in the deepest layers that's exactly what we find then
we find stromatolites now those are living organisms that are anchored to the ground that
look like giant sponges they don't move either so what's gonna happen in a flood they're the first
to be buried they can't leave it then you're gonna get things like trilobites and then trilobites
what do they do they can only crawl so they're the next to die then you get sponges they're the
next to die and then everything after the sea the water starts to go on land and bury the life there
what do we look at when we look at the geologic chart we literally see aquatic life that can't
move very good at the bottom layers then the aquatic life that can move then land life and
then that can't move good and then land life that can move good and then birds right so we're seeing
what exactly we should see if there was a global flood but they've turned the evidence into their
own theory saying no no no this is proof that we evolved from that worm that's the problem
it's incredible I was watching Bill Nye and there's this video I'm sure you've seen it where
it says that the video title on YouTube is Bill Nye destroys Noah's Ark and he goes through that
point he'll say well there's no instance the reason we know the floods of fraud is because
there was no instance where one kind of animal would transition you know you wouldn't find
multiple kinds of animal or families of animals and in different layers you'd find the most
prehistoric ones at the bottom and you know the more modern ones at the top well hydrologic
sorting accounts for all of that and that's of course what we'd expect in a global flood so I
mean you basically just took his so-called evidence against the flood and proved that he
actually proved the flood while using an oxymoron in saying that he's destroying Noah's Ark which
doesn't make any sense guy doesn't any sense no it doesn't and here's the real problem that he
has first of all he's never investigated it if he was to look at the geologic column what do we
find we find bird tracks before we ever find birds we find dinosaur tracks before we find dinosaurs
and I'm not just saying like oh here's a track and there's no dinosaurs around no there's dinosaur
tracks and then there's millions of years of layers and then there's the dinosaur corpses
well where the corpses with the tracks they're not there we find diet bird foot tracks no bird
carcasses where they they're in the upper layers because they were out running a flood we find the
scenario down the fine we have trilobites that are rolling through millions of years of geologic
time and then the and then the fossil of that trilobite so you're telling me that trilobite
lived for millions of years and then died come on come on no way how about dinosaurs that were
stomping through the mud running from the flood like a Tyrannosaurus we have I have multiple
pictures of this and then it ran away and then the layers solidified well now the mud literally
is indented with dinosaur tracks stomping through millions of years of geologic time what are you
talking about that's not possible those layers don't bend it's the dinosaurs running in soft
mud then it turned hard and now they want to tell us that each of those layers are a million years
it's impossible this is absolute proof that there was a flood simple as that that is awesome
Shane Paul do you guys got any thoughts on that yeah it's just it's just crazy that you know
people actually believe this like you know listening to you talk about it it just it just
seems like just common sense like just apply common sense to to the flood and all this stuff
that you're saying and and then people are just like no no it's all wrong it's all wrong so I
just don't understand how people can't just see through the lie yeah here's an interesting one
I'm ancient aliens is real popular right now it's a TV series that's out and they actually recognize
that there was a worldwide flood that's what's astonishing they could they believe in
catastrophism they said look at this there are rocks in the United States that way that are
megalithic rocks hundreds of thousands of pounds they don't just get up and they're there they've
shown that they don't roll there so how did they get there they said these had to have been moved
in a flood and there's areas where you can see ripple marks still in the ground where there was
water that was over 100 feet deep in that region I mean they they literally proved the flood force
so that's really good but we don't need that proof we literally can walk around and go to dinosaur
graveyards around the world and what do we find they died in positions of suffocating suffocating
what a dinosaur suffocating but why is it Tyrannosaurus Rex discovered under 60 feet of mud
died with their head up that's suffocation why did it why was it covered by 60 feet of mud what
could possibly do that other than a flood that your answer is nothing so fossils are extremely
rare to begin with and then when we do find them when they're entirely intact they died from
suffocation I mean get real come on people I mean there's logic and then there's like denying
and they're to the point where they actually are denying evidence now and I'm going over the
physical evidence of what we actually look at I want to tell you the best evidence that we have
for the flood is actually in us and in all the animals around us that are alive it's in their
genetics now if I were to say what is the best evidence for the flood genetically well guess
what the Bible tells us that we descended from Noah and his three sons and daughter-in-law so
that means we should come from three people that means we should find three major haplogroups in
all people that should go back to that common ancestor that's exactly what we find what are
the odds of that that's incredibly rare and incredibly and implausible and from an evolutionary
standpoint nearly impossible they cannot account for that there's no possible way and then to say
that there's one Y chromosome that's in all human beings showing that we descended from a single
male and then it's been tracked Jensen dr. Jensen from answers in Genesis took the high-quality DNA
stretched it out it's the first time they've ever actually had high sequencing data he traced it
back 4,500 years ago then we have the co1 gene inside of you and me and all animals we all
contain mitochondria and all of that mitochondria all has 37 of the exact same genes one of those
genes is called the co1 it's a small fragment of an area and it's only a few hundred base pairs
now it's easy to test and it's really cheap so the largest study that's ever been done by the
Rockefeller University went out and they tested almost hundreds of thousands of species not 10
hundreds of thousands and they determined that 90% of all life that's on earth went through a
bottleneck recently and now this is the problem the study also tested fish aquatic life died as
well what could do that other than a global flood nothing nothing that's what confused the scientists
the most in the study they're like we don't see any of these intermediaries that did our Darwin
was talking about and then we actually find evidence that all 90% of everything that's alive
today went through a bottleneck and that other 10% was living before the bottleneck so that means
90% of everything that lived before the flood died 10% lived how many things went on the ark
well that's about 10% of all the life that was needed to replenish the earth and it did its job
so when we see some extinct animals today people are like well why would God let the animals go
extinct don't worry about it they did their job they replenish the earth for mankind because the
earth was made for us so it's fascinating that we look at that one gene and we see that there's low
genetic diversity in all life and including human beings and that shouldn't be so if evolution is
true because evolution says that millions of years have passed therefore there would be massive
amounts of genetic diversity and it's not there so genetics actually proves the flood to be true
more than anything else that is incredible that is really incredible and I appreciate that you
take these complicated things because genetics is a complicated field of science and you bring it
down to where everybody can understand it and that is just awesome and yeah I mean you know I
appreciate you coming on the show man I I have never heard of you dr. Rahmat and you're awesome
I can't wait to check out your what your YouTube channel standing for truth more is there any other
way that people can find out more information about you oh yeah let's just say that you went
to Amazon and you typed in Rahmat one word our books would pop up and you can find us that way
as well I try to make our content free and it is but we also have books so that more people can
find us and kind of support us at the same time even though there's actually no support because
my books actually are at cost it's however much Amazon actually wants to charge so I can't charge
less because that's how much it costs them to print the book but essentially we have as many
books as we can put out there trying to cover as many topics as possible we started writing last
year and we have a lot of books covering most of the major topics that are out there that confuse
people like human evolution standing for truth wrote that one refuting the critics any of their
objections that come up you know we try to write in a layman thing but when we get into books like
refuting the critics it gets really technical because the only critics that exist come from
the evolutionary biologist so they're they're coming in with technical questions and and we
answer them in a technical way but that's another way you can find us but just typing in Rahmat on
YouTube you can find my channel but it's very small it's what I what I post very just very
seldomly but most of the content that I make goes funneled right to standing for truth okay so now
did the books are you right are is you they're right because you said we is it you or is it a
group of you guys that write them we take turns I wrote one in particular this this monster right
here that one's good it's called the younger creation model and and then I write um we we
break our we are work up because we're busy you know I mean I make videos and well it's very time
consuming to write a book so I can only imagine yeah so we kind of split it up my next one coming
out I could even post it even tonight if I wanted to it's debunking our and Raw's entire flood
series I take every word he says out and I turned it into a book and I debunked every phrase and
statement that he makes that'll be a fun one I'm still trying to think of a title name that's why
I haven't released it and and so while I'm doing that he's standing for truth is working on the
human evolution one and debunking neanderthals being monkeys and stuff like that right so he's
debunking that I'm debunking something else so we're as a team we're not writing books with
each other we're actually individually writing our own just to just to make it easier yeah we
tried teaming up and writing a single book together but we wrote a lot of the same thing
twice and it became a mess it was more work than it was yeah well I really appreciate you coming on
the program today and talking with us it's been a fun episode man so what are some of the the the
main reasons people even believe in evolution because you know I I just can't even write none
of it made sense because I was I was raised in a Christian home so it doesn't make sense to me
at all but why do people believe in evolution because they mutations are I'm sorry evolution
is a vague word it means change it literally just means change so what they say well do you
believe things change well yeah therefore you believe in evolution right and then when you say
well I don't believe that a land mammal little walking creature turned into a whale and they'll
believe well they'll just say well you believe things change why can't you believe given enough
time things can change that much so they're see what I mean it's just they're trying to say it's
a possibility that things could so if you use your imagination enough it's a possibility it's
kind of like the the theory that monkeys can type Shakespeare right if you give enough time and
enough monkeys it'll eventually happen right that's their theory if you allow for infinity
with an infinite amount of monkeys they'll eventually type Shakespeare that's their
mindset going in not and we'll ignore the part where that's actually been tried in a study and
failed completely but in in reality that's what they believe so there's is a belief system that
goes by the simplistic law of well things do change so therefore evolution is true it's a
very rudimentary form of belief that's all and they their system relies on mutation to take it
but since mutations don't do the change that they require in a timescale that's reasonable they have
to invoke millions and millions and millions of years because evolution can't be true on the short
scale it has to have time to work and since that's not testable observable or repeatable it's
literally not science that's it yeah so you have to learn this stuff from a young age and to believe
it I mean you have to be taught this at a young age because it doesn't make sense if you just
see you're just learning about it for the first time as an adult yeah exactly and then when you
get into it and you start getting in and you start arguing with the people about it they're
like well why couldn't it work it's kind of like you're trying to defend defeat a negative
statement it's like well you first of all you have to explain why it does work you're not doing
it you point to the Lynskey experiment which was just a bunch of bacteria that was put in
different environments and they said look at it evolved and all it did is go through massive
reductive evolution it was throwing genes away just to survive it was cornering itself to live
in just that specific environment 50% of them are dead the other 50% specifically epigenetically
adapted to that one environment so it would survive and then if they're removed they'll
die instantly so their fitness went up a little bit and everyone was hurrah it's proof of evolution
they adapted to their environment it's like I'm sorry guys that's not how this works you need you
need those bacteria to not only adapt to that environment but then be better than they were
before to show that something like a bacteria like ancestor can branch into all forms of life
you see when Darwin wrote his book he drew a single tree of life and everything came from
that single root ancestor he didn't know what it was but it didn't really matter he just said that
that's where it all came from they've been trying to prove that ever since and just recently that's
been falsified it's no longer a single Darwinian tree of life now it's a three-tier domain bush of
life so the more time passes the more it's gonna turn into a creation model and they'll be unable
to defend it eventually the more they they falsify themselves over and over and over eventually
though they won't be able to keep sweeping it under the rug because people like me are just
gonna see it they're gonna post it for everybody to see and they won't be able to hide and be like
oh no how embarrassing like in the 1960s Ernest Mayer came out and said did you know that because
evolution is true of course it's a fact that animals today when we when we learn about the
genome and we learn about the everything and what's going on we're gonna learn that no life
alive today shares any commonality at all because evolution has been going on for millions of years
well guess what when we looked in the genome we share tons of genes and everything the genome
with all life on earth so something that actually falsified the theory is now used as the best
evidence for the theory when in reality that's what it did it falsified it it completely proved
they were wrong but now see they twisted it they you turn and said ah see that proves we come from
a common ancestor because we share all of these things together see what they do they sweep it
under the rug they hide from it and they twist the information to make it sound like it's it's
always been in there okay the information and the evidence has always been on their side when it's
not you know that Darwin when he went to the Galapagos Islands and he saw the Darwinian finches
that are named after him the Darwin finches he literally went over there and said well if if
evolution is true then I predict my finches are going to speciate one time every 3,000 years that
was his prediction what do we know today about those Darwin finches they speciate once every
3.3 years that's how fast speciation is actually happening completely contradictory to what he
said it would be based on evolutionary timescales so evolution just doesn't work because what they
say happens and what needs to happen doesn't happen in the real world what we're seeing is
fast speciation rates and that's exactly what we see you see if the ark literally landed 4,500
years ago and all these animals came off of it well how many bird species are there today well
how many were on the ark it says that if Noah took all the different bird families he would have
brought about 245 bird families on the ark and from that they would have started speciating and
they would have branched around the world well we only have about 10 to 20,000 but if evolution
was true and you go back 200,000 years to their last worldwide bottleneck and there's a speciation
event for each of those birds let's just say that only one in favor of evolution by the way let's
just say that one bird lived in the bottle from the worldwide bottleneck 200,000 years ago and
that one bird mated with another you know that the pair survived and they mated well if you get
a bird species going every 3.3 years from those you're never you're gonna get a number of bird
species that is far beyond 10,000 to 20,000 I'm sorry you're gonna get thousands hundred thousand
bird species and that's not what we see and that would be if we only reduce them to one bird pair
I mean the evidence is so much against evolution when it comes to speciation rates you can literally
go online and type in lizard and you see there's about 4700 different types of lizard species well
how many lizards were on the ark only a couple pair they came off they started speciating that's
exactly what we see those are the numbers line up exactly with what we would expect but again if
evolution was true and lizards are speciating once every year over 200,000 years you would
200,000 or more lizards far more than that if more than one lizard pair survived which of course
there would have been and that's not what we see so I'm sorry just everything that I look at shows
creation to be true and invalidates evolution invalidates it so the the mechanism that pushes
evolution forward isn't true the the observations aren't true that when we look at the flood
everywhere we look from geology to how about when we start looking at the the king's list have you
ever heard of this before it's a heritage list that goes back to Britain they discovered that
the royalty in Britain has always been in the family they interbreed they marry their first
cousins the reason why is because they keep it in the family lineage as much as possible well
that makes it really easy to track lineage did you know you can track the British king's list
all the way back to Adam incredible incredible that is literally incredible I mean you have
literal proof in front of your eyes and I and I feel like at the end of the day like the Bible
is something that I accept by faith but but oh man like they're like there are so many things
that you can prove like you can literally prove a young earth you can scientifically prove that
man and dinosaurs live together you can say scientifically prove a flood I mean they say
where's your evidence where's your evidence I don't need to provide you evidence I can provide you
proof you just heard it right here tonight ladies and gentlemen dr. all Matt let me ask you this
I've heard in debates where people will cry out and this will probably be our last question because
we want to keep this episode short because we'd like to have you on again okay there are people
who will claim that it takes millions of years for evolution to occur and that these change of
allele frequencies over time will result in change of you know you'll change from certain
animal families to different animal families so my question to you would be how would you respond
to somebody who cries out I heard somebody say we need more time Kent we need more time
what do you do when they ask for more time I would just say no you need more time I don't need
more time because we say that a change happens because of recombination and gene conversion
these are rapid these happen very quickly it's why if you had 1,000 children not a single one
would look identical to one another because recombination is occurring in the genome and
every single kid that you have is going to be different so yes there's changes that are
occurring and they're rapid changes but they're not the type of changes that evolution needs to
be true you're never going to have a child that's born with wings so they need mutations to happen
to do that so they need vast amounts of time for a wing to form for a mutation to form you would
need a gene that needs to arise to to form this wing and then the wing has to know that it's got
purpose a half of a wing is useless so it has to have forward thinking evolution isn't forward
thinking it doesn't do that it's not it's not a thought thing if it doesn't work it's going to
get rid of it selection is going to remove it it's going to say this is worthless I'm expending
energy on something that my body doesn't need right now I got to get rid of it so unless
evolution can happen instantly it's not true and we don't see it happening instantly what we do see
is rapid variation within kinds and then there are limits on what happens within these
kinds probably the most diverse animal that you could ever find would be the equids or the deer
you find lots of different variety in them and they go through massive rapid recombination in
the genome they need more time for their fairy tale to be true we don't we see rapid change
because we believe in recombination and gene conversion that's the mechanism that we believe
works because that's what we see that's what we observe that's what we test and that's what we can
repeat and studies they say no mutations did it we go where's the evidence well
we don't have we don't need it because time you know because deep time it's like well you just
admitted yours is pseudoscience I'm sorry you just admitted amen and amen dr raw matt thank you so
much for coming out of the show and shane thank you so much for being with paul and I today what
did you think of it it's great it's good you know lots of lots of good information and other you
know just a matt the other matt is very informative you know I'm curious to see him we're gonna have
him on the other matt the other matt right the other other matt right so we're gonna like you
said we're gonna have him on again so I'm curious to see you know as as we move forward in the series
just you know how how it evolves I guess right yeah matt thank you and raw matt thank you so
much for coming on this program man you're awesome I can't wait to get you back on
awesome thanks a lot man and here's a question I've seen arise in the last few comment sections
and I just wanted to throw it out there for everybody that's listening right now that's a
critic they're gonna say well why should I trust the bible and I tell them you don't have to you
can put the bible to the scientific test and it passes with flying colors and then you'll believe
it amen that is awesome folks this is episode 7 of answers in creation and I just want to say
in closing before we close this thing out dr raw matt has uh really helped um my scientific
background he's actually helped uh not only my personal scientific background and he's mentored
and coached me in this specific area but he's also played a key role in this new film we've
got coming out the atheist religion and when this movie comes out folks make sure you share it with
your friends because a lot of the things that you heard tonight you're gonna hear them amplified and
in high quality hd with music and cinematically dude that that trailer was awesome I just watched
it for the first time tonight and great job matt amen I love that outside interview it turned out
good huh it actually did it's funny because when you came over and filmed it I was skeptical of
doing it I know you're skeptical of doing it outdoors but we did it and it looked great I
thought so yeah cool well awesome thank you matt for coming on the program tonight thank you thanks
for having me all right god bless man nice all right that was dr raw matt uh creation scientist
really nice guy can't wait to get him back on the program uh guys make sure you head over to our
backup channels uh on bitchu and brightion uh we are getting censored here on uh framing the world
quite heavily and uh so we need you guys to go and subscribe to those channels you can also support
us by uh going to our patreon account and donating through that as well um matt good job getting uh
him on the the program tonight man uh that was a great guest thank you so much and I just want
to mention real fast before we close our and raw will often talk about uh myself or kent hovind
and he seems to really want to come after us when he knows that me myself and dr hovind we're not
very familiar well we're familiar with phylogeny but it's not something that we specialize in
he never mentions dr raw matt now we're always mentioning him to
aaron but he he he won't even say his name because aaron knows that in a debate it would be a smack
down from the beginning raw dr raw matt would win the debate in the opening statement he wouldn't
even make it past round one and grow a beard while he's at it right
that would be amazing so that's a challenge to you are and actually i would say if you wanted
to come on my channel you know and have a debate with dr raw matt if raw matt agreed to it
if i could talk him into it and i could talk you into it i would be happy to moderate something
like that but uh in the end at the end of the day i don't think you're gonna do it because
he wrote a whole book falsifying your claims and um you know that you have nothing and so
uh at the end of the day folks creation science is science and this was episode seven and thank
you so much paul for what you do and putting the show together yeah man it's been fun and you know
what evolution is dumb yeah thank you guys for joining us here tonight and thank you shane for
coming all the way from canada my pleasure to join us i'm just glad to be here i love doing
these shows so yeah thanks paul well we like to keep you up all night and then send you off to
drive all day back to canada that's how i roll right all right thanks matt and thank you all
for tuning in make sure you share this video and get the word out about dr raw matt also subscribe
to his youtube channel standing for truth again guys thank you so much for tuning in answers in
creation episode seven god bless guys subscribe to our bitches and brighton channels check the
description nice subscribe now