Carbon-14 dating is a way of determining the age of certain archaeological
artifacts of a biological origin up to about 50,000
years old. So I'm just going to go ahead and ask
the question, why is it then that we find carbon-14
inside of dinosaur bones that are supposedly 65 million years old?
I'd like an answer to that. People say, dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago.
Really? There's C-14 inside the bones. According to this article, which is
a scientific paper, it says that carbon-14 only lasts 50,000 years in any
organism that it dies in. Yes. And soft tissue. We find soft tissue
in all of these dinosaur bones. Blood cells, hemoglobin in the blood.
But oh, it lasted millions of years. Anybody that believes that is gullible.
You're a gullible person if you believe that. Okay, does anybody in here remotely
think that that's even possible for a soft tissue to last 65 million years?
And here's how they answer that. Well, you see, it's about the...
It was contaminated. What happens if you contaminate blood? It
deteriorates worse. It was contaminated. Do you know what a
stupid argument that is? Oh, but it was fossil. The blood was
fossilized. Wait a minute. You say a fossil takes 10,000 years to
form. Is blood going to sit there on the ground
for 10,000 years waiting to be fossilized?
No. They say, well, it's the method of the fossilization of the bone.
The iron in the blood then. Okay, great. Do you see organisms getting
encapsulated by iron when they die in nature?
They say, well, if we put iron or blood in iron, it preserves the cells. That must
have been how it lasted. This was found nowhere near iron deposits.
This was not found near iron. And yes, even if you put dinosaur soft
tissue in an airtight jar and then put that airtight jar in
another airtight jar in another airtight jar,
it's going to deteriorate. I don't care if it's airtight.
It's going to deteriorate. Anybody that says that dinosaur soft tissue can last
65 million years, they are out of their mind. They are
gullible people, period. And if you vouch for that, you are a
gullible person. If you really believe that, you say, well,
that's not enough evidence. I need cross-examined evidence. You need to be
able to cross-examine. What about the dinosaur tracks that are
65 million years old and the old time strata?
Oh, really? Is it just a coincidence that we find
man tracks with dinosaur tracks in these layers that you say are
65 million years old? I was in a debate with Dr. Kenny Rhodes from
Reasons to Believe, and I brought this up to him, right?
And he looked at me. He goes, well, even though it looks like a man footprint
and anatomically it may be the same, how do you know there wasn't a creature
that looked just like a man?
Talk about believing things without evidence, believing
it is unbelievable what unbelievers will believe to remain
unbelievers. Unbelievable. And don't get angry at me over that.
Don't get angry at me for telling you the facts, for telling you the truth
that you should have heard when you went to school and learned that the universe
popped into existence by nothing with no God.
Folks, the public school system is completely absurd what they're teaching.
Monkeys surfing, dinosaurs farting to death, squids and octopi coming from
outer space. Look, their rescue devices are weak, and you
always need to point that out. If you're in a debate with them,
point it out. It's a very weak argument. Be respectful,
but just point out it's a weak argument. And in some cases we find man
footprints on top of the dinosaur footprint.
I'm sorry, that means they existed at the same time. You cannot deny that. That's
another cross piece of evidence there. It's cross
examined.
They say, well, you know, grass didn't evolve till 55 million years ago.
Dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago, so dinosaurs never saw grass.
So your Bible's wrong when the Bible says that the behemoth
eateth grass as an ox. No, the Bible was right.
And we actually examined copper lights, you know,
dinosaur dung, and somehow it lasted 65 million years, guys.
We found dinosaur dung, lasted 65 million years, and guess what we found in it?
Grass. The dinosaurs actually ate grass. It says
microscopic examination of the fossilized dinosaur dung from India now
shows that the massive plant-eating dinosaurs munched heaping
helpings of at least five different types of grass.
They're concluding all this off the fossil record, right? So they're saying,
well, grass didn't exist when dinosaurs existed in the fossil record.
Precambrian rock layers are supposedly the oldest layers that there are. It's
where the jellyfish that we all descended from
originated. The sponge, our ancestor, the great-great-great-grandfather Sponge
Bob. That's really what they believe. We're
arguing against people that believe in literal
network, that that is your ancestor. Nickelodeon, Sponge Bob, that's
literally what we're arguing against. People say, how do you always win the
debates? I'm arguing against people that, for lack of a better word,
idiots. I don't mean to say that to be rude, but
sometimes you have to argue with literal idiots. Precambrian is before
dinosaurs existed. Well, we find bird tracks before dinosaurs
even existed in the precambrian rock layers. Wait a minute, didn't dinosaurs
turn into birds? Why is it that there are bird tracks on
the very bottom layers? Here is what they say. This is what
Charles Lyell said about these bird tracks.
Remember, this is millions of years before birds existed, supposedly.
Charles Lyell said that these tracks were produced. They weren't real bird
tracks. It's Native American Indians that got
bored and decided to draw some tracks in the
precambrian rock layers. That's literally what they're saying.
They're literally saying that Native Americans
drew these tracks. If you believe that, you are gullible,
period. You're gullible. Stop saying Christians are gullible for
believing the Bible, a book written by goat herders. What's wrong with a bunch
of goat herders? Last I checked, that was actually a
pretty good occupation back then, before electricity.
So stop spewing your own confusion with yourself
onto all of Christianity. We don't want it. It's a fallacy of false equivalence.
Are chickens related to the T-Rex? This is in a kid's book.
Question, are chickens related to the T-Rex? Answer,
yes. Science has revealed compelling evidence
that the T-Rex actually evolved into a chicken.
Folks, you know what we continuously find in the fossil record?
Dinosaurs with birds in their stomachs. But dinosaurs, wait a minute, they didn't
exist with birds. They turned into birds. No, you find
dinosaurs with birds in their stomachs. They didn't descend into birds, devolve
into chickens. They ate them. And we have proof for that.
You bring this up to them and they don't have a clue of what you're talking about.
That's not true. There's no fossil evidence with
and you show them the actual photo and they don't believe it.
They say, well, how can I believe in a God that I can't see? Why don't you start
believing what you can see first? It's called delusional if you're not
going to believe what you can see. And if you believe things without
evidence, you're holding to a position that's
indefensible. This is proof that the devil himself
exists. The fact that you could believe in
evolution and be so deceived and so tricked is
proof that Satan deceives. That you have been deceived by the God of
this world which has blinded the minds of them which you believe not, the Bible
says. They say you're so superstitious you
believe in the devil. You better believe I do because he
deceived you into believing pond scum to people
evolution, bacteria to biologist, goo to you, the zoo to you, fish to
fishermen. That's what they think. So don't comment me with, oh it's
superstitious to believe in that old book.
You know I'm glad that it is an old book and that it's been around for a long
time. You're admitting by saying it's an old book that it is historic,
that it is reliable. When they say it's an old book
written a long time ago, I'm glad God didn't leave us without his word for
thousands of years. Glad we have the word of God and that
we've had it for a long time. You're admitting
that it's been around for a long time. When I bring forth my Bible model,
they say it's your Bible model, haha. Yeah I bring forth my Bible model
and they try to argue against it. They say, oh it's crazy you think it rained
for 40 days and 40 nights. You google rained for millions of years.
They think it rained for two million years.
So remember they think rain created itself from nothing
with no God and rained down into the oceans
for two million years. What did the first single-celled organism eat? That's
what I'd like to know. There was no organic material. It just
came alive. What's it gonna eat? Hard rock?
You know we find a t-rex right under 50 feet of sediment that had suffocated to
death when it was buried. There is no other way to explain
something like that other than Noah's flood.
They say a local flood could have done it. No, false. It would have just ran away.
A t-rex dinosaur simply would have ran away. It had to have been globally
catastrophic. That's why we find 10,000 adult myosaur buried in the
center of the United States that had left their young behind.
They say, why are you bringing up the same tired old arguments that creationists
always have used since the 1980s? Well because they're right.
And the truth stays the truth. They say, well what if you're wrong?
I know I'm not wrong because two plus two is four. It will always be four.
The facts will always be the facts. Again, these are the fundamentals of
Young Earth Creationism. When I was in college, I played college
basketball and my coach always told me that if you master the fundamentals
you'll be a great player. And if you're a creationist and you want
to get in the middle of this fight, just master the fundamentals and you
will win every time.