Now in John chapter 2, the part of the chapter that I'd like to focus on is beginning in
verse 18 where the Bible reads,
Then answered the Jews and said unto him, What sign showest thou unto us, seeing that
thou doest these things?
Jesus answered and said unto them, Destroy this temple, and in three days I will raise
it up.
Then said the Jews, Forty and six years was this temple in building, and wilt thou rear
it up in three days?
But he spake of the temple of his body.
This is a situation that occurs over and over again, especially in the book of John, but
throughout the four gospels where Jesus Christ is speaking spiritual truths unto people,
and they take everything he's saying a little bit too literal, and they apply it unto the
flesh.
In the next chapter, if you would, flip over to John chapter 3, and we'll find one of the
most classic examples of this in the Bible with Jesus speaking to Nicodemus where he
says in verse 1,
There was a man of the Pharisees named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews.
The same came to Jesus by night, and said unto him, Rabbi, we know that thou art a teacher
come from God, for no man can do these miracles that thou doest except God be with them.
Jesus answered and said unto him, Verily, verily, I say unto thee, Except a man be born
again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.
Nicodemus saith unto him, How can a man be born when he is old?
When he entered the second time into his mother's womb and be born.
So isn't this kind of the same thing that we saw in chapter 2?
Jesus Christ, when he talks about being born again, he's not speaking of literally being
born again.
He's speaking in a figure.
He's speaking of something that is symbolic, not literal, because obviously he's not saying
that a man needs to enter the second time into his mother's womb and be born.
But again, just as they misunderstood his words in chapter 2, they're misunderstanding
his words in chapter 3, because they're unsaved, they're confused.
Now what I want to talk about tonight is the subject of things being interpreted in the
Bible literally versus figuratively.
Now this is something that brings a lot of confusion to a lot of people, because there
are some people who just think that everything in the Bible is literal.
And that can lead you to a lot of false conclusions and wrong doctrine if you have this idea that
everything in the Bible is literal.
But then on the other extreme, you have people that will say, hey, it's all symbolic.
And when you say it's all symbolic, you know what you're doing?
You're pretty much just reducing the Bible to a book of fairy tales.
Like none of it's true.
None of it really happened.
That's why the Bible says, study to show thyself approved unto God, a workman that needed
not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth.
And one of the ways that we need to divide the word of truth is being able to divide
between that which is literal and that which is figurative.
Only when Jesus said, destroy this temple and in three days I'll raise it up.
He was not speaking literally of that temple that they were thinking of.
He was actually referring to his body symbolically as a temple, because in three days he would
raise that body up.
When he died, he was buried and then three days later he rose again.
And by the way, that's one of the best scriptures in the Bible that proves the bodily resurrection.
Because he said, I'll raise this temple up and he spake of the temple of his body.
A lot of false religions like the Jehovah's Witnesses will teach that Jesus' resurrection
was just a spiritual resurrection, but the Bible teaches that it was a literal bodily
resurrection.
So when we get to John 3, Jesus talks about being born again.
Nicodemus takes it too literally, doesn't understand it.
He responds in verse number 5, Jesus answered, verily, verily I say unto thee, except a man
be born of water and of the Spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
That which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
Marvel not that I said unto thee, ye must be born again.
The wind bloweth where it listeth and thou hearest the sound thereof, but canst not tell
whence it cometh and whither it goeth, so is everyone that is born of the Spirit.
Nicodemus answered and said unto him, how can these things be?
Jesus answered and said unto him, art thou a master of Israel and knowest not these things?
So here he begins to rebuke Nicodemus a little bit for his lack of spiritual understanding.
Here he is claiming to be a rabbi, claiming to be a religious leader, and he doesn't understand
the spiritual truths of God's Word, and Jesus is rebuking him for not knowing what he's
talking about.
Now go to chapter 4 of John.
So in chapter 2 we saw the temple was figurative for Jesus' body.
In chapter 3 we saw that being born again was figurative for being saved, and you say
why would God talk about being saved as being born again?
Well because when you were born into your family physically, that's when you were born
of water.
A lot of people will try to make this born of water mean baptism.
This has nothing to do with baptism because he said you have to be born of water and of
the Spirit because that which is born of the flesh is flesh and that which is born of the
Spirit is spirit.
See the flesh birth is a water birth.
When the woman gives birth, what happens?
What breaks?
The water breaks, right?
Because the baby is encased in water and the water breaks and the baby's born.
That's the physical birth.
Well the new birth, the spiritual birth, is when we're born into God's family.
That's when God becomes our Father.
The Bible says, but as many as received him, to them gave he power to become the sons of
God, even to them that believe on his name.
So when you believe on the name of Jesus Christ, you become a son of God.
You become a daughter of God.
He's your father and he'll never leave you or forsake you.
Just like your parents will always be your parents, God will always be your father.
Even if we disobey him, he's still our father.
He's going to discipline us when we disobey him, but he's still our father.
I was out soul winning a couple days ago with brother Mike that was here visiting this morning
and he had a great illustration when we were out soul winning because he was giving somebody
the Gospel and this guy was a little bit hung up on the fact that salvation is all of faith
and not works.
He thought that you could lose your salvation or that you had to do good works and a lot
of people will confuse loving God with being saved and they'll say, well you have to keep
the commandments because God said if you love me, keep my commandments.
But here's the thing, not everybody who's saved loves God as much as they should.
But he had a great illustration because he said to this person, he said to them, did
you love your parents when you were growing up?
And he said, oh of course I loved my parents when I was growing up and he said, okay, so
you always obeyed them then, right?
Did you always obey your parents?
Well no, I didn't always obey them.
Well why not if you loved them?
So you see, we love our parents.
It doesn't mean that we always obey our parents.
We love God.
It doesn't mean that we always obey God, but you know, the more we love God, the more we
obey him.
The less we love God, the less we obey him and we can measure our love for God by our
obedience to God.
But you know what?
That's why you measure salvation because salvation is by grace through faith, not of
works that a city man should boast.
And so this illustration about being born again is a great illustration for salvation
symbolically.
Why?
Because God's our father after we get saved because we're born into that family.
Why?
Because God will discipline us just as a father will discipline his child.
Why?
Because you're born in a moment of time and you're born again in a moment of time.
You're born physically one time and you're born again one time.
So it's a great symbol of salvation, but being born again is not literal.
Jesus' body being a temple is not literal.
Look at chapter 4 of John, verse 10.
It says, Jesus answered and said unto her, If thou knewest the gift of God, and who it
is that said to thee, Give me to drink, thou wouldest have asked of him, and he would have
given thee living water.
The woman saith unto him, Sir, thou hast nothing to draw with, and the well is deep.
From whence then hast thou that living water?
So again, we see someone misunderstanding.
He's speaking figuratively.
He's likening eternal life unto living water.
She takes it literally.
Well, how are you going to get the water out of the well?
You don't have anything to draw with.
Look what Jesus said, or look what she says in verse 12.
Art thou greater than our father Jacob, which gave us the well and drank thereof himself
and his children and his cattle?
Jesus answered and said unto her, Whosoever drinketh of this water shall thirst again,
but whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him shall never thirst, but the
water that I shall give him shall be in him a well of water springing up into everlasting
life.
Here he makes things clear, but she still doesn't get it, because look at verse 15.
The woman saith unto him, Sir, give me this water that I thirst not, but neither come
hither to draw.
Okay, she doesn't get it.
At first it sounded like she was getting it.
Sir, give me this water so I'll never thirst again, because I don't want to have to come
back to this well.
You don't get it.
You're still going to have to come back to the well for physical water, but spiritually
speaking you'll never thirst again.
So again, three chapters in a row, we have Jesus giving a spiritual truth, it's figurative,
it's symbolic, and people are taking it too literally, and they're not understanding it.
This is a wonderful illustration of salvation, because he said if you drink of the water
that I give you, you'll never thirst again.
Now this again proves that salvation is a one-time thing, just like being born again,
and that once saved, you're always saved.
He said if you drink of the water that I give you, you will never thirst again.
It'll be a well of water, flip over to chapter 7, he said it'll be a well of water springing
up into everlasting life.
Look at John chapter 7 and verse 37, it says in the last day, that great day of the feast,
Jesus stood and cried saying, if any man thirst, let him come unto me and drink.
Now he's not saying, hey I've got a water cooler here, you know if anybody thirsts come
on over here, this is the concession stand.
That's not what he's saying, he's speaking figuratively.
Because he says in verse 38, he that believeth on me, as the scripture hath said, out of
his belly shall flow rivers of living water.
But this spake he of the Spirit, which they that believe on him should receive, for the
Holy Ghost was not yet given, because the Jesus was not yet glorified.
So again we see the same type of thing.
Go back to John chapter 6, John chapter 6 verse 25, do you notice a pattern here where
Jesus is speaking spiritual truths and people are taking them too literally, and the people
who take them too literally are unsaved people, just people who are just, they don't have
the spiritual discernment to be able to understand what Jesus is saying.
Look what it says in John 6 25, and when they had found him on the other side of the sea,
they said unto him, Rabbi, when camest thou hither?
Jesus answered them and said, verily, verily, I say unto you, ye seek me, not because ye
saw the miracles, but because ye did eat of the loaves and were filled.
Labor not for the meat which perisheth, but for the meat which endureth unto everlasting
life, which the Son of Man shall give unto you, for him hath God the Father sealed.
Now to get the context here, earlier in John chapter 6 was the story of the feeding of
the five thousand.
This is where Jesus Christ had a great multitude of people, five thousand men, not counting
women and children, and they were all there to hear and preach, and they'd been there
for a really long time and there was no food for anybody to eat.
So Jesus wanted his disciples to feed the people, and all they could find were five
loaves and two fishes.
One boy brought his lunch and he had five loaves and two fishes, and they brought it
to Jesus and they said, well, you know, we have here five loaves and two fishes, but
what are these among so many?
What is this going to do when we're feeding five thousand men, not counting women and
children, that they couldn't even all have one bite?
And of course Jesus does a miracle where he prays and he just starts breaking the bread,
breaking the fish, and it just keeps coming, it just multiplies, and he ends up feeding
five thousand men.
Then they go and gather up the leftovers and they have twelve baskets full of leftovers.
There's more left over than what he started with, and it was a great miracle.
But what Jesus is saying here in John chapter 6 is that the people are not following him
at this point because they saw the miracle, because they believe he's the Son of God.
That actually they just like the free food.
I mean, that's basically what he's saying.
He says in verse 26, Jesus answered them and said, verily, verily, I say unto you, you
seek me, meaning you're looking for me, not because you saw the miracles, but because
you did eat the loaves and were filled, and he's saying in verse 27 that they should be
more concerned about spiritual food than the physical food.
He says to them, you know, the spiritual food is the Word of God that I'm preaching to you.
The Word that I'm speaking to you is spiritual meat and drink.
The Bible says man shall not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out
of the mouth of God.
He said, that's why you should be following me, to hear my word.
But you're just interested in physical food.
You're missing the point.
Now let's keep reading.
It says in verse 28, then said they unto him, what shall we do that we might work the works
of God?
Jesus answered and said to them, this is the work of God that you believe on him whom he
hath sent.
They said therefore unto him, what sign showest thou then that we may see and believe thee?
What does thou work?
Of course he already did an amazing miracle earlier in the chapter, but apparently that
wasn't enough.
Our fathers did eat manna in the desert.
As it is written, he gave them bread from heaven to eat.
Then Jesus said unto them, verily, verily, I say unto you, Moses gave you not that bread
from heaven, but my father giveth you the true bread from heaven.
For the bread of God is he which cometh down from heaven and giveth life unto the world.
Then said they unto him, Lord, evermore give us this bread.
Now it's clear that these people are thinking about physical food from start to finish.
Because if you notice, first he accused them of just being there to get the food, not because
they saw the miracle.
Then they say to him, we want you to perform a miracle, and in fact the miracle where God
made bread come down from heaven, that was a cool miracle.
How about that one?
That's what they want him to do.
They want manna from heaven.
That's the example that they give of the type of miracle that they'd like to see.
And then he starts talking about the bread of life that the father sends down from heaven.
He's talking about himself, because later he's going to say I'm the bread of life.
But then they're saying, Lord, evermore give us this bread.
We want to eat, again, they just want to eat the food.
It's clear.
But let's keep reading.
Jesus said unto them, I am the bread of life.
He that cometh to me shall never hunger, and he that believeth on me shall never thirst.
Now stop.
Is he talking about physical hunger and thirst?
Is he saying, hey, once you get saved, you'll never have to eat or drink again.
I mean, is that what we tell people when we're out soul winning?
Look, if you just believe on Jesus Christ, you'll never have to eat or drink again.
Think about how much you're going to save on your grocery bill, just from never having
to hunger, never eating.
Is there any doubt that this is not literal?
Isn't it clear?
So let's keep reading.
So he says to them, they'll never hunger, they'll never thirst.
But I said unto you that ye also have seen me and believe not.
All that the father giveth me, were in verse 37, shall come to me, and him that cometh
to me I will in no wise cast out.
For I came down from heaven, not to do mine own will, but the will of him that sent me.
And this is the father's will which hath sent me, that of all which he hath given me I should
lose nothing, but should raise it up again at the last day.
And this is the will of him that sent me, that everyone which seeth the son, and believeth
on him, may have everlasting life, and I will raise him up at the last day.
The Jews then murmured at him, because he said, I am the bread which came down from
heaven.
Do you notice a pattern with these people?
They don't get it.
They're thinking that he's literally saying that he's a loaf of bread.
I mean, you have to think that these people are a little bit dumb.
Because over and over again he makes it really clear that he's speaking in a way that's symbolic
and they just take everything so literally.
How can he say he's bread?
How can a man be born again?
How can he go back into his mother's womb?
How are you going to give me living water?
You don't even have a bucket to dip into the well.
It's just a pattern that happens over and over again.
Now look what it says here.
They murmured against him, and they said, because he said I'm the bread which came down
from heaven, verse 42, and they said, Is not this Jesus, the son of Joseph, whose father
and mother we know?
How is it then that he saith, I came down from heaven?
Jesus therefore answered and said unto them, Murmur not among yourselves.
No man can come to me except the Father which has sent me.
Draw him, and I will raise him up at the last day.
Now let me just stop here at verse 44.
A lot of Calvinists will pull this verse out and say, no man can come to me except the
Father draw, you know, you have to be drawn, except they forgot to read in John chapter
12, a few chapters later, when he said, And I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will
draw all men unto me.
Will draw all men unto me.
So again, they pick and choose and take things out of context, but let's keep reading.
It says in verse 45, It is written in the prophets, and they shall all be taught of
God, every man therefore that hath heard and hath learned of the Father cometh unto me.
Not that any man hath seen the Father, save he which is of God, he hath seen the Father.
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that believeth on me hath everlasting life.
I am that bread of life.
Your fathers did eat manna in the wilderness, and are dead.
This is the bread which cometh down from heaven, that a man may eat thereof, and not die.
I am the living bread which came down from heaven.
If any man eat of this bread, he shall live forever, and the bread that I will give is
my flesh, which I will give for the life of the world.
Now is there any doubt when you read verse 51, when he talks about giving of his flesh
for the life of the world, he's talking about dying on the cross.
He said when he broke bread with his disciples at the last supper, he said this is my body
which is broken for you.
Now was that bread literally his body?
This is my body which is broken for you.
It's symbolic.
It's clear.
And he's saying, I'm going to give my flesh to the world, because he's going to die physically,
his physical body is going to be killed.
That's what he's saying here.
It's crystal clear.
Let's keep reading.
The Jews therefore, verse 52, strove among themselves saying, how can this man give us
his flesh to eat?
I mean, they sound like Nicodemus.
They sound like the woman at the well.
Then Jesus said unto them, verily, verily, I say unto you, except ye eat the flesh of
the son of man and drink his blood, ye have no life in you.
Whoso eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternal life, and I will raise him up
at the last day.
There's a whole false religion based on these two verses called Roman Catholicism.
Based on a misunderstanding that, like the Jews, says it's all literal.
This is all literal.
He's literally going to give us his flesh to eat.
We're literally going to climb up into our mother's womb and be born again.
We're literally going to never be hungry again.
We're literally never going to be thirsty again.
It's nonsense, folks, but it's funny.
It's all symbolic.
The whole sermon is clearly symbolic, but then they'll just take these two verses and
say it's literal.
A whole false religion is based on this.
Keep reading.
He said in verse, and I'm going to show you, and here's the thing to remember, whenever
something's symbolic, though, it means something, and I'm going to show you what it means because
he explains what it means.
Let's keep going.
He said, whoso eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood hath eternal life, and I will raise
him up at the last day, for my flesh is meat indeed, and my blood is drink indeed.
He that eateth my flesh and drinketh my blood dwelleth in me and I in him, as the living
Father hath sent me, and I live by the Father, so he that eateth me, even he shall live by
me.
Is there any sane person that would actually think he's saying you're going to actually
eat my body?
Literally.
No, because it's clear that it's all symbolic.
He says in verse 58, this is the bread which came down from heaven, not as your fathers
did eat manna and are dead.
He that eateth of this bread shall live forever.
And again, when he says live forever, is he talking about bodily?
Is he talking about your flesh living forever?
Is he saying you're never going to physically die?
No, when Jesus talks about living forever, he's talking about your soul living forever
in heaven.
Let's keep reading.
It says in verse 59, these things said he in the synagogue, as he taught in Capernaum.
He therefore of his disciples, when they had heard this, said, this is a hard saying.
Who can hear it?
When Jesus knew in himself that his disciples murmured at it, he said unto them, does this
offend you?
Now let me just point this out.
When the Bible just talks about the Jews, it's not talking about his disciples and his
followers.
It's usually just kind of talking about the masses, most of whom are not saved.
When the Jews murmur at his saying, he just doubles down.
The Jews are saying, hey, you can't give us your flesh to eat.
He just doubles down and says, well, you know what?
You must eat the flesh of the Son of Man or you have no life in you.
He just doubles down.
But when he hears that his disciples murmured at it, he has a different reaction because
these are people that are actually believers.
It says, when his disciples murmured at it, verse 61, Jesus knew in himself that his disciples
murmured at it, he said to them, does this offend you?
What it if you shall see the Son of Man ascend up where he was before?
Watch verse 63.
It's explained.
The parable is explained.
It is the spirit that quickeneth, the flesh profiteth nothing.
The words that I speak unto you, they are spirit and they are life.
Now there's the explanation right there.
Because a minute ago, he said, except you eat the flesh of the Son of Man, you have
no life in you.
But here he says, it's the spirit that quickeneth or brings to life.
Because he said, you have no life in you?
Here he said, it's the spirit that quickeneth or gives life.
The words that I speak unto you, they are spirit and they are life.
But there are some of you that believe not.
Now this makes perfect sense when you understand that the manna in the wilderness in the Old
Testament represented the Word of God.
Because the Bible says that he did suffer thee to hunger, this is Deuteronomy 8-3 I believe,
he suffered thee to hunger and fed thee with manna that thou mightest know that man does
not live by bread alone, but by every word that proceedeth out of the mouth of God, doth
man live.
Manna in the wilderness was symbolic of the Word of God.
Now in the Old Testament, there was literal manna that came down from heaven that they
ate.
But there was also a symbolic meaning where that manna represented the Word of God.
And just as we every morning should wake up and read the Word of God, they had to go out
every morning and gather the manna.
And the manna pictured God's Word.
So when Jesus is saying in John chapter 6, when he's saying you have to eat the flesh
of the Son of Man, he's not saying physically eat my body.
That's ridiculous.
He's talking about the Word of God.
They must have the Word of God to be saved.
Eternal life comes through the Word of God.
See he says it's the spirit that quickeneth the flesh, profit, and nothing.
David said in Psalm 119 repeatedly, thy word has quickened me.
It says elsewhere the entrance of thy word giveth light.
The Bible says faith cometh by hearing and hearing by the Word of God.
The Bible says he shall tell thee words whereby thou and all thy house shall be saved.
The Bible says of his own will beget he us with the word of truth that we should be a
kind of first fruits of his creatures.
The Bible says receive with meekness the engrafted word which is able to save your soul.
What is it that saves our soul?
The Word of God.
The power of God's Word.
Faith cometh by hearing.
Hearing by the Word of God.
What this scripture is teaching when Jesus said I'm going to give my flesh for the world,
he's not saying it's going to be a cannibalistic thing.
He's saying I'm going to die on the cross, I'm going to physically die.
And when he says you have to eat of the bread that came down from heaven, he said I'm the
bread of life, he's saying that's the Word of God.
You say well what does Jesus have to do with the Word of God?
Jesus is the Word of God.
Because the Bible said at the beginning of this book, John, and hopefully when you're
reading John 6, hopefully you already read John 1.
Before you come to chapter 6, you've got to go in order, right?
John 1 said in the beginning was the Word and the Word was with God and the Word was
God.
And then he says the Word was made flesh and dwelt among us.
And we beheld his glory, the glory is of the only begotten of the Father, full of grace
and truth.
So when Jesus is talking about his flesh, he's talking about the Word made flesh.
And he's using that as a symbolism of the Word.
When he says I'm the bread of life, I'm the bread that came down from heaven, that's because
the manna of heaven represented the Word and Jesus is the physical incarnation of the Word
of God.
But you see how you can get false doctrine from just an uber literal interpretation?
Everything's literal.
And again, Roman Catholics notoriously misunderstand this passage that's clearly symbolic.
Because if the Catholics are going to say this is literal, we literally eat his body,
we literally drink his blood, okay, well then we should literally never be hungry again
after we do it.
I mean I should be able to attend one Catholic mass and eat that wafer and drink that wine
and I should never be hungry again and I should never thirst again, literally.
But again, it's just taking something out of context to deceive the masses of the Roman
Catholics.
Now, let's go to Romans chapter 5, let's change gears because honestly I could take all night
and show you all the things in the Bible that are not literal.
Because let me tell you something, there are a lot of things in the Bible that are not
literal.
And you say, oh this is blasphemy, I can't believe this, we believe in the literal interpretation.
But here's the thing, the Bible says we need to rightly divide the word of truth.
Now you say, well Pastor Anderson, how am I going to know what's literal and what's
not?
Okay, was there any doubt of the meaning of John 2?
Was there any doubt of Jesus' meaning in John 3?
Do you have any doubt about Jesus' meaning with the woman at the well?
Do you have any doubt about the fact that you're going to physically hunger again after
you believe in Jesus?
I mean is there any doubt about, look, when the Bible is symbolic, it's obvious.
You can't go into it with this attitude that says it's never going to be symbolic, it's
always going to be literal.
No, but here's the key.
It's literal unless it is obviously symbolic.
But there's a lot of stuff in the Bible that's obviously symbolic.
So when in doubt, obviously you want to go literal and not just turn it all into some
spiritualized fairy tale.
But there are many places in the Bible that are clearly symbolic.
You say, how am I going to know?
Well, first of all, you need to be saved.
Because if you're a believer, if you're saved, you have the Holy Spirit living inside you
and he'll guide you into all truth.
And he's going to show you what the word means and he's going to help you to discern this
and understand this.
So the people that are misunderstanding this stuff, they weren't saved.
Nicodemus wasn't saved, the woman at the well wasn't saved yet.
The Jews in John 6, they were unsaved people, many of them.
And so you've got to be saved and then you've got to just use common sense when you're reading
the Bible.
I mean, a lot of it's common sense.
Now, here's the other opposite extreme.
So one wrong extreme is just everything's literal.
And look, this teaching of the Catholics that we literally eat Jesus' body is a bizarre
teaching.
They literally teach that that wafer, once you eat it, becomes Jesus' flesh in your stomach.
I mean, that's bizarre.
It's creepy.
Eating blood is something that the Bible commands us never to do.
Never to eat blood because it's something that is demonic when people are eating blood
and being cannibal and things like that.
But not only that, there have been some strange, we were talking to this, we're making the
movie Marching to Zion, the new movie that's going to expose Judaism and all that.
And I was talking to this rabbi and he was talking about, he was ripping on the Catholic
church to us, which is fine with me.
But they just look at that as Christian.
So he pulled out some history book and showed us where there was this thing where the Jews
were being accused of torturing the wafer.
So basically, they snuck into, and basically he was saying, yeah, this is the kind of stuff
people lied about the Jews.
Because I guess the Jews were accused of breaking into the church, stealing the wafer,
the special Catholic wafer, and then they tortured the wafer because they wanted to
re-crucify Jesus and punish him again.
It wasn't bad enough what they did to him the first time.
So they actually tortured a wafer.
And the Catholics, they took that real seriously because they were like, that's Jesus.
And then they killed a bunch of Jews or something.
This is like in the 1300s or something.
But that's just two stupid religions, both of them.
I mean, they're both false.
Both of them are ridiculous.
The Jews are ridiculous for plenty of other reasons, and then the Catholics are ridiculous
to think that they're actually torturing.
I mean, you can't torture an inanimate object.
Now we've got their wafer, we're going to torture this thing and make him suffer all
over again.
I mean, what kind of a bizarre idea is that?
Who came up with that?
But you know what?
There are a lot of people who believe a lot of weird things.
And if you believe that a cracker is going to turn into Jesus when you swallow it, that's
a really weird doctrine.
And here's what's funny.
People who are Catholics, they think anybody, like for example, if you go to other countries
where Catholicism is really prevalent, they think anybody who's a Christian who's not
part of the Catholic Church is in a cult.
Like if you go to Germany, oh, you're Baptist, that's a cult.
That's a cult.
Everything's a cult.
You know, oh, you're Christian, you're a cult.
You know, it's just because you're not part of the main church.
All these sects, all these cults.
But here's the thing.
Catholicism is actually the biggest cult in the world.
Because if you look at what a cult is, it's when you're following and worshiping a man.
You know, when we use the word cult, for example, you'll often hear the term cult of personality.
Who's ever heard that term?
Personality cult.
Usually you'll hear that term associated with people like Joseph Stalin or Mao Zedong.
You know, the cult of personality is where they're obsessed with and worshiping a man
and following a man.
And when we think of what we would consider religious cults, we think of Mormonism.
Why?
Because they're following man, Joseph Smith, and they elevate him to a God-like status.
Or Ellen G. White is lifted up by the Seventh-day Adventist as being a prophet of God when in
reality she was a false prophet, so therefore it's a cult because they're rejecting the
teachings of the Bible in order to follow man.
You know, well, one man in that case.
For example, you know, David Koresh, you know, down with the Branch Davidians at Waco.
Basically that was considered a cult because David Koresh is saying, you know, I'm another
coming of Jesus Christ or whatever he claimed to be.
You know, we think of people following Charles Manson as being in a cult because they were
brainwashed and worshiping Charles Manson and they're willing to do whatever he tells
them to do and so forth.
But if you think about it, Roman Catholicism worships the Pope.
So I mean that makes it a cult because he can actually override the Bible.
You know, when Joseph Smith overrides the Bible, we call it a cult.
You know, when Ellen G. White overrides the Bible, we call it a cult.
When Charles Manson or David Koresh overrides the Bible, we call it a cult.
You know, when people are worshiping Stalin and when people are worshiping Mao Tse Tung
and when people are worshiping Kim Jong-Il, we call it a cult.
Even though it's not even religious, we call it a cult of personality.
People have even talked about, you know, a cult of personality around Obama.
You know, when some people get obsessed with Obama or any politician, they'll say, hey,
that's a personality cult.
Some churches where the pastor is overly elevated and they'll say, hey, that's a personality
cult because they're just really worshiping that guy.
There's nothing wrong with being excited about the truths that are being preached, but they'll
get excited about other aspects of the pastor like, you know, we need to wear our hair like
him, we want to dress like him, you know, we want to eat all the foods that he eats
and stuff.
You know, it's like, whoa, that's taking it a little too far where you just want to just
emulate the physical persona and start just being exactly like that guy, okay?
That's where it's like a personality cult.
But if you think about it with the Pope, he speaks ex cathedra, he overrides the Bible
for the Catholics.
And not only that, I always say this, when the Catholics say, hey, we don't worship the
Pope, but I always say this, but when the Pope shows up, they get down on their knees
and bow down to him.
The Bible defines that as worship.
And whenever anybody gets down and bows down onto Peter and James and John, they lift them
up, they tell them, stand up, I'm also a man as thou art.
When they try to bow down to Paul and Barnabas, they don't let them bow down to them because
that's an act of worship, and today people want to bow down to the Pope, get an audience
with the Pope, just touch the hem of the Pope's garment, and never wash that hand again.
Why?
Because it's a cult.
And not only that, if I told you there's a Christian cult out there, so-called Christian
cult, where there's a guy that speaks in the place of God and he can override what the
Bible says, and that guy wants you to eat human flesh and drink blood to be saved, you'd
say that's a wicked, bizarre religion.
Well it's Catholicism.
Oh, well, wait a minute.
But it is bizarre.
It is weird.
And so John chapter 6 is clearly figurative.
But let's talk about the other extreme.
I've got to hurry.
But a lot of people will take another extreme of just saying, hey, everything's figurative.
It's all symbolic.
Now look at Romans chapter 5.
The Bible says in Romans chapter 5 verse 12, wherefore is by one man sin entered into the
world and death by sin, so death passed upon all men, for that all have sinned.
For until the law sin was in the world, but sin is not imputed when there is no law.
Nevertheless death reigned from Adam to Moses, even over them that had not sinned after the
similitude of Adam's transgression, who is the figure of him that was to come.
Now a lot of people, if they want to start just saying everything in the Bible is symbolic,
one of the places that they'll start is with Adam and Eve.
And they'll say, hey, the story of Adam and Eve is just a symbolic story.
It didn't really happen.
All of the Jewish rabbis we spoke to when making the film, they all said it's symbolic
because they believed in the Big Bang, evolution, et cetera.
Now this is just people wanting to believe in the lie of evolution and trying to somehow
make the Bible fit in with them.
Now if you read Genesis chapter 1, it's crystal clear that every animal brings forth after
its own kind.
It denies evolution in the first chapter of the Bible.
But they say, well, Adam's symbolic.
But how do we know that Adam is not symbolic?
How do we know that Adam was a real character?
Here's why.
Adam gives us the exact genealogy from Luke chapter 3 gives us from Jesus all the way
back to Adam.
So if Adam was just a figurative guy and Eve was figurative, then how did Eve give birth
to Seth?
Who then engendered Enos, who gave us Canaan, who gave us Mahalel, which gave us Jared,
which gave us Enoch, which gave us Lamech, which gave us Noah, which gave us Shem, which
gave us our fact set, which gave us boom, boom, boom, boom, boom, all the way down to
Jesus Christ.
Look, how could it be a figurative guy if he had children and those children spread
out and became different nations and God tells us, hey, this nation came from this guy and
this nation came from this guy.
All throughout Genesis, all throughout 1 Chronicles, these genealogies are given in specific detail
of where humanity came from.
How can that be figurative?
But phony preachers like Billy Graham who want to please everybody and please the world,
he basically said, well, Adam and Eve, God breathed into Adam's nostrils.
That might have been God just took an ape.
This is what Billy Graham said.
God breathed into a certain ape and he became homo sapiens.
It evolved and evolved and evolved and evolved and then you got the ape man, Australopithecus,
and God breathed into him and called him Adam.
That's not what the Bible says.
And the Bible is really clear that these stories in the book of Genesis are literal stories.
Well you say, but in verse 14 it says that he's a figure.
At the end of verse 14 it's saying a figure of him that was to come.
Adam is a figure of Jesus because the Bible talks about Jesus as the second Adam.
Was Jesus figurative?
No.
Jesus was a real life human being who lived.
He was God in the flesh.
He was literal.
The first Adam was literal.
The second Adam was literal.
And verse 12 says, as by one man, sin entered into the world and death by sin.
How did death enter into this world?
Why is there death in the world today?
Because of Adam's sin.
Now if you had evolution going on, you'd have millions of years of people living and
dying before anyone had ever sinned.
Because Adam was the first one that sinned.
One man, sin entered into the world and death by sin.
But if you have evolution, they say, oh well you can fit evolution in the Bible.
Well no, because you'd have all kinds of sin and all kinds of death before Adam ever even
came on the scene.
And that doesn't make any sense.
So we have to be able to rightly divide the word of truth between what's figurative and
what's literal.
So I'm not trying to say to you, hey, everything's figurative.
Nothing's literal.
Much of it is literal.
And in fact, I think the best way to read the Bible with common sense and with the Holy
Spirit as your guide is just to realize that when in doubt, it's literal.
But that often things are figurative and it's clear when it's figurative.
And he usually explains to you what the figure is.
He explained to you what born again meant.
Explained to you what the living water was.
He explained to you what the bread of life meant.
He explained to you what he meant when he said, I'll give you my flesh to eat.
But look if you would at Genesis chapter 7, because another thing that people will attack
as being literal, they like to go after, and again we could go through the whole Bible
and take all night, I'm not going to, that's why I'm just throwing a few examples at you.
But one thing they go after a lot is Adam and Eve.
Another thing they go after a lot is Noah and the flood.
Hey, that's all figurative.
Well if you look at the story here, because what people are saying more and more is that
the flood was not a worldwide flood.
It didn't wipe out everybody, they'll say.
It didn't kill everybody.
It was just a local flood.
And Noah just thought it was the whole world that was flooded because he lived in a little
valley and that was his world.
And that's what he thought.
But here's the thing about that.
Noah lived 600 years before the flood.
And he just never got out of the valley.
I mean he's 600 years old, he'd probably gotten out of that valley a little bit.
You know what I mean?
In 600 years, wouldn't you think?
But even so, you say well that was his world.
But let's look at what the Bible says about the flood in Genesis 7, 17.
It says, and the flood was 40 days upon the earth, and the waters increased and bare up
the ark, the ark is a giant boat that Noah had built, and it was lift up above the earth,
and the waters prevailed and were increased greatly upon the earth, and the ark went upon
the face of the waters.
You say, well, when it says earth, it's just talking about the land, the dirt, the earth,
just in his area.
Okay, but let's keep reading.
And the waters prevailed exceedingly upon the earth, and all the high hills that were
under the whole heaven were covered.
15 cubits upward did the waters prevail, and the mountains were covered.
Now, that is saying that 15 cubits is about 22 feet, so the Bible is saying that above
the tallest mountains, the water went an additional 22 feet at its highest point.
Now, let me explain something to you about water.
If water rises up above the tallest mountain, it's going to gush over.
Now think about it.
If it's just local, oh, it's just a local flood.
Okay, so here's the valley that Noah lives in, right?
And his valley is flooded, and it goes above the tallest mountain.
What was there?
Just like a magical force field, just holding the water in?
Like it just went straight up.
Think about how dumb this is.
But brilliant scholars and educated men have decided that the Bible teaches it was a localized
flood.
Well, listen to me, Mr. Scientist.
If water goes 22 feet above the mountain, it's going to spill over.
So in order for the water to go 22 feet above the mountain, it would have to be everywhere
on the earth, because there would have to be nowhere for that water to go.
Does everybody understand what I'm saying?
There would have to be nowhere for it to go.
Everything would have to be filled for the water to cover the top of the tallest mountains,
and that's exactly what happened.
This is clearly not figurative.
This is literal, everyone died, and that's why every nation of the earth is accounted
for as coming from the three sons of Noah, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
Listen to me, you today are a direct descendant of Israel, but anyway, that's another sermon,
but you today obviously are a descendant of Noah.
Everyone come from Noah, because Noah had these three sons, Shem, Ham, and Japheth.
Now here's the thing, I've heard some people say this, they'll say, well Japheth is all
the white people.
I've heard people say Japheth is where the white people come from.
Shem is where those that are from Asia come from, and Ham is where those that are black
come from, the Africans.
But here's what's so dumb about that.
Think about this, let's say you're getting off, you're one of these people that gets
off the ark, right?
Shem, Ham, and Japheth, right?
They have their three wives, and they have kids, right?
Let's say you're one of those kids, who are you going to marry, your sister or your cousin?
I mean think about that.
If you're getting off the ark, and you have Shem, Ham, and Japheth, they're the only people
on the earth, and they have kids, Shem has kids, Japheth has kids, and Ham has kids.
Do you think that all the children of Ham just married their sisters, and all the sons
of Japheth married their sisters, and all the sons of Shem married their sisters?
You know what obviously happened?
They married their cousins, not their sisters.
And so you know what that means?
It was all mixed in the first generation.
So to sit there and say, oh this nationality is from Shem, this nationality is from Japheth,
and this nationality is from Ham, and those are the three races on the earth, is retarded
because you'd basically be saying that they all just married their sister, and nobody
married their cousin.
And you say, well but they spread out right away.
Wrong.
They built the Tower of Babel.
And that means that they stayed together, if you read the scripture, for 100 years.
So when they got off the ark, they were told, be fruitful and multiply.
And for 100 years, they married each other, and multiplied, and had children, and reproduced,
and multiplied.
So this whole Shem, Ham, and Japheth thing was intermingled in the very first generation.
So to sit there and say that there are three, the Bible does not teach three races.
The Bible doesn't teach any races.
It teaches that we're all of one blood.
All nations of the earth are one blood.
And you say, well, but some people are black.
But I guarantee you, every black person has white person in their genealogy.
And every white person has a black person in their genealogy.
And every Asian person has white people black.
Because it's all mixed.
It's all mingled.
And even for example, I just got my DNA tested recently, because, you know, for the documentary
that we're making, and it showed that, you know, I'm an African American today.
I'm serious.
I'm not even kidding.
So I got my DNA tested, and it said that my number one most prevalent genetic DNA marker
is North African, Moroccan Berber.
Who knows who the Berbers are?
My children, right?
Because I've explained to them.
Two other people.
Well, the Berbers are people who live in Morocco, you know, and I've always wondered why I love
to eat couscous.
And now I understand why.
You know, I love that Moroccan food.
But anyway, I mean, it listed my 50 most prevalent ethnicities, and number one on that list was
Moroccan Berber.
In fact, I had seven different types of Berbers in my ancestry, all in my top 50.
And in fact, five of my top 10 were Moroccan Berber.
So I mean, that's genetically what I am, more than anything else.
You know, so I'm North African, according to this.
You know, they sent me a map showing where my ancestry is from.
It was all of North Africa.
And what's right across from Morocco?
What's right across the Straits of Gibraltar?
Spain.
And it showed also that I had a ton of DNA from Spain.
So I had a ton of DNA from Spain.
I had DNA from Morocco.
The Berbers are pretty much white looking people, but they're living in North Africa.
But I also had a little Egyptian mangled in there.
So I'm a Vishmail.
And I also had a little bit of Arab mixed in.
So I'm also Arab.
And also, I'm part Portuguese.
And here's the thing.
People that are Portuguese are part black.
Because the Portuguese are mingled between blacks and Spaniards.
So therefore, just I've already shown from my DNA, you know, I've got black people in
my ancestry.
I've got Moroccan Berbers.
I've got Arabs.
I've got Egyptians.
I've got Spaniards.
I'm Hispanic.
I'm African American.
I'm an Arab.
I mean, give me affirmative action now.
Give me a college scholarship now.
Now, I don't want to go to college.
But anyway, I'm just saying, it's so dumb when people just think that it's all just
so cut and dry.
I mean, I thought, you know what I've been told my whole life?
Oh, you're Swedish, Irish, English, and Danish, and Swiss.
It's just all like these super white nationalities.
You're Irish, English, Swedish.
You know, you forgot to tell me that I'm Arab, and that I'm Spanish, and that I'm Portuguese,
and that I'm Brazilian, and that, you know, why?
Because nobody even knows what they are.
Because it's all mingled.
It's all mixed.
So anyway, I thought that was interesting.
But anyway, that's a literal story about Noah's Ark.
It's a real story.
We see it in the Bible.
That's where we all came from.
We all came from Shema.
And you know what's funny?
We talked to the DNA scientists.
Go to one last place, Galatians 4.
We talked to a DNA scientist, and here's what the DNA scientist told us.
He said that, you know, if we go into really advanced DNA studies, he said the furthest
that we can go back is like 5,000 years.
Because after you go back 5,000 years, he said it's all mingled.
You know, you can't tell any difference.
Well, here's what's funny about 5,000 years.
What happened 5,000 years ago?
Well, think about this.
Noah was born, I don't have the numbers in front of me, but Noah was born approximately
5,300 years ago.
And the flood happened approximately 4,700 years ago.
So the flood happened like 4,700 years ago.
Noah was born like 5,300 years ago.
He had his kids, you know, what, 4,800 years ago.
It just shows you that's why the DNA kind of goes back to around 5,000 years, and all
of a sudden it's all the same.
You know why?
Because that's where we all came from.
So this isn't figurative, it's literal, okay?
Now again, things that are in the Bible that are literal stories, they also have symbolic
meanings.
But that doesn't mean the story is not literal.
Story of Adam was literal, also a symbolic meaning about Jesus.
Story of Noah was literal, also a symbolic meaning about Jesus.
Look at Galatians chapter 4, verse 21, it says, "'Tell me ye that desire to be under
the law, do ye not hear the law?
For it is written that Abraham had two sons, the one by a bondmaid, the other by a free
woman.
But he who was of the bondwoman was born after the flesh, but he of the free woman was by
promise."
Look at verse 24.
"'Which things are an allegory?'"
Now what's an allegory?
It means it's symbolic, it means it's figurative.
Now it doesn't mean that these people didn't really exist, but there's also a symbolic
meaning.
It's an allegory.
Now here's what's funny.
When you start talking about the fact that we as believers in the New Testament have
replaced the physical nation of Israel as being God's chosen people, this is what they'll
say.
Well those who believe in replacement theology, they often tend to spiritualize everything.
They tend to spiritualize Israel.
Well you know the Bible does tell us that it was an allegory.
You know when we look at the difference between Israel and Ishmael, or the difference between
Isaac and Ishmael, what's the allegory?
It says in verse 24, "'For these are the two covenants.'"
Now look, there are two covenants, or two testaments, Old Testament and New Testament.
Well let me tell you something, they're not both in effect.
The Old Testament has been replaced by the New Testament.
The Bible says, "'And that he saith a new covenant, he hath made the first old.
Now that which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.'"
We are living under the new covenant.
Now how can you say, well both, a lot of people will say, well I believe that Christians are
God's chosen people, I believe Christians are the elect, but I also believe that unsaved
Jews are the elect.
You can't have both.
I mean, you can't sit there and say, well the old covenant is still in effect and the
new covenant wrong.
Like as if the new covenant is just overlaid on top of the old covenant wrong.
The new covenant replaces the old covenant, my friend.
"'The law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ, and that he saith
a new covenant, he hath made the first old.
That which decayeth and waxeth old is ready to vanish away.'"
Hebrews 8.13.
He's making a new covenant when he came and died on the cross and was buried and rose
again.
We're in the New Testament.
We're not in like a hybrid.
You know, you can't put new wine into old bottles.
The New Testament is a new wine in a new bottle, okay?
And both are preserved.
And the Bible says here in verse 24, which things are an allegory for these are the two
covenants.
Notice he doesn't say these are the seven dispensations, because there's no such thing
as seven dispensations.
What are the seven sons of Sceva?
No, the two sons of Abraham are two covenants, alright?
He didn't have seven sons representing seven dispensations.
He's talking about these two particular sons, Isaac and Ishmael.
He says, the one from Mount Sinai, why?
Because the law was given by Moses, that's the old covenant, Mount Sinai.
And he says that it's from Sinai which gendereth the bondage, which is Hagar.
So look, Hagar is the mother of Ishmael, okay?
Ishmael is the bastard son of Abraham.
It says in verse 25, for this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia and answereth to Jerusalem
which now is and is in bondage with each other.
Look, the current city of Jerusalem is in bondage today.
Oh, it's the freedom in the Middle East, democracy.
Look, it's in bondage, because whosoever committed sin is the servant of sin.
Oh, they're free over there.
It's a free country.
Hey, they're in bondage spiritually.
They might be free to some degree, but it's an allegory, alright?
I'm making a poem, but anyway, what I'm saying is that they today are in bondage because
they are spiritually Ishmael.
Let's keep reading.
It says, Jerusalem which is above is free, which is the mother of us all.
Now, is the city of Jerusalem literally our mother?
No.
It's a figure.
It's an allegory.
It's symbolic.
Although my grandfather used to say to my mother that she had the map of Jerusalem written
on her face because he thought that she looked Jewish.
We're getting her DNA tested.
We're going to find out, but anyway, Jerusalem is our mother spiritually, but not the current
city of Jerusalem, the new Jerusalem, the heavenly Jerusalem.
Oh, I want to visit the Holy Land.
Well, you know, you're going to have to die to get there.
I mean, if you really want to go to the real Jerusalem, because the one today is a bondage
place.
It's a place of the old covenant that's not free.
It says in verse 27, for it is written, rejoice, thou barren that bearest not, break forth
and cry, thou that travailest not, for the desolate hath many more children than she
without a husband.
Now we, brethren, as Isaac was, are the children of promise.
He's talking to Gentiles in Galatia, and he says, were like Isaac, were the children
of promise, but as then, he that was born after the flesh, persecuted him that was born
after the spirit, even so it is now.
Nevertheless, what sayeth the scripture?
Cast out the bond woman and her son, for the son of the bond woman shall not be heir with
the son of the free woman.
So then, brethren, we are not children of the bond woman, but of the free.
He says, look, if you're a brother in Christ, even if you're a Gentile of Galatia, if you're
of the Lord Jesus, you, as Isaac was, are the true children of Abraham.
And the Jews today are spiritually Ishmael.
That's the allegory.
They are spiritually of Hagar and Ishmael.
And notice he says, the one that was born of the flesh persecuted him that was born
of the spirit.
That's what we see all through the book of Acts.
The Jews persecuting the Christians, because the Jews are the physical seed of Abraham,
Christians are the spiritual seed of Abraham, and the Jews are persecuting the Christians.
Just like Ishmael mocked Isaac.
Just like the Talmud mocks Jesus.
It's the same thing.
And that's what the Bible says.
But watch this.
It says, cast out the bond woman and her son, for the son of the bond woman shall not be
heir with the son of the free woman.
So the question is, who's going to inherit the earth?
Who's going to inherit Jerusalem?
Who's going to inherit the kingdom of God?
Who's going to inherit the millennial reign of the Lord Jesus Christ when Jesus said,
you know, fear not little flock, you know, it's the Father's good pleasure to give you
the kingdom.
And who's going to inherit the earth?
Both.
Does this say both are going to inherit?
He said cast out the bond woman and her son, they will not inherit with the son of the
free.
So it's not both.
Oh, it's just both.
Pastor Anderson said, it's both.
The Christians are God's chosen people and the Jews are God's chosen people.
It's both.
No, it's not both.
Because God didn't let Isaac and Ishmael both grow up in Abraham's house.
He didn't let them both live in that house.
Once Isaac came along, time for Ishmael to go.
Now Ishmael was there until then.
Ishmael was allowed to live in that home.
Remember Hagar tried to flee and God said to Hagar, go back, live with Abraham, submit
to Sarah.
And he said, I'm going to make you a great nation.
And Ishmael stayed in that home.
But when Isaac came, time for Ishmael to go.
Why?
Because they're not going to inherit together.
So to sit there and say that, you know, we're both God's chosen, we're both.
And they say, well, in the end times, you know, we're both.
In the end times, it's going to be both of us going into that millennium.
Both of us going into that kingdom.
It's going to be a Jewish kingdom.
It's going to be a Christian kingdom.
That millennial reign of Christ.
Because guess who's ruling?
Christ.
Christian Christ.
You get it?
Okay.
Christ is ruling a Christian kingdom.
Well, but he's going to rule from Jerusalem.
Yeah, but it's not going to be the current.
It's not going to be like the current Jerusalem.
The current Jerusalem is a den of iniquity.
Okay.
Come in and clean house and create a spiritual kingdom.
You say, well, but Jews will be reigning.
Yeah, all the ones that are saved.
Why?
I mean, look, does anybody deny that there are lots of Jews or Israelites who have been
saved?
So yeah, they're going to be inheriting.
You know, and there's going to be a great resurrection.
I mean, aren't we premillennial?
So don't we believe in a great resurrection of all the saved before the millennium?
At the rapture and so forth?
Well, then what's going to happen?
All kinds of Israelites from the Old Testament and Israelites from the New Testament are
all going to be resurrected just like I'm going to be resurrected.
Well, hopefully I'll be alive and remain under the coming of the Lord.
But if I don't, I'll be resurrected.
But think about this now.
Yeah, there are going to be a lot of Israelites over there in the land.
In fact, in fact, all the 10 tribes will come back from the dead.
All the 12 tribes will be there back in the land from the dead ruling and reigning with
Jesus.
And we'll be ruling and reigning, you know, I don't know.
I don't know if I'm going to be ruling and reigning in Israel.
You know, I'm probably going to be ruling and reigning in Morocco.
I think God's going to say to me, be thou over Morocco.
Because you know, as it turns out, that's my nationality, I guess I'm going to be ruling
and reigning somewhere in North Africa.
That's my goal in the millennium.
But anyway, my point being that, you know, with this sermon is just to show you that
there's a lot of stuff in the Bible that's symbolic and figurative.
So don't get this overly literal interpretation of things that are obviously figurative.
When the Bible talks about a woman having the sun on her head, hey, that's literal.
No, it's not literal, right?
It's figurative.
It'd be stupid.
Oh, she's standing on the moon.
She's not really standing on the moon.
It's figurative.
If I say it's raining cats and dogs outside, does anybody take me literally?
So what do you use?
Common sense.
What do you use?
The Holy Spirit's guidance.
And you know what?
You have to understand that most of the Bible is literal.
So don't throw out the baby with the bathwater.
You need to be able to rightly divide.
How am I going to do it?
Study.
So that you might rightly divide that which is figurative and that which is literal.
And by the way, everything that's literal is also figurative.
But there's much that's symbolic.
So I hope that helps you just open your mind a little bit.
And maybe as an exercise, if you want to put this into practice, why don't you just read
the book of John and just read through the whole book and just decide, OK, what's literal
and what's figurative?
And if you're saved and you have minimal intelligence, you're going to be able to figure it out.
Because it should be obvious to you.
You know, you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure this stuff out.
But you do need to be saved and you do need to just use common sense and let the Lord
speak to you as you read his word.
Let's bow our heads and have a word of prayer.
Father, we thank you so much for your word, Lord.
It's such an amazing book, such an interesting book, Lord.
And it's so deep, Lord.
It has so many different meanings.
It has literal meanings, figurative meanings.
Help us to study, to show ourselves approved.
Help us to rightly divide the word, Lord.
And help us to not be led astray with false doctrine by people who are being overly literal
or by people who are being overly symbolic, Lord.
Help us to find the truth within the pages of your word and in Jesus' name we pray.